Incorporating Fairness Into the Gateway‐Based Risk Mitigation Policy for Hazmat Transport

ABSTRACT In hazardous material transport on road networks, two conflicting objectives must be addressed simultaneously: minimizing risk and minimizing cost. Risk mitigation policies may yield as a secondary outcome uneven flow distribution on the network. This study empowers an existing risk mitigation policy based on gateways (GBP) to improve fairness. According to GBP, each vehicle is obliged to traverse a compulsory node (a gateway) on its minimum cost itinerary from origin to destination. Gateways must be located on a few network nodes and assigned to vehicles to minimize total risk, yielding a bi‐level optimization problem. GBP already proved able to reduce total risk by opening just a few gateways and to a limited detriment of total cost. However, gateways may end up acting as flow concentrators, thus hampering equity. This study aims to bridge the gap between risk mitigation and fairness. To this aim, we generalize the multi‐commodity flow formulation of the problem by imposing a capacity constraint on the nodes, discuss its impact on the model structure, and experimentally investigate whether it is possible to achieve a more equitable risk distribution and how total risk and total cost are affected.