Comparative Analysis of Traditional vs. Modern Estimating Methods: Pros and Cons of Different Approaches in Construction

In construction project cycle, accurate cost estimation is key that plays a major role in project feasibility, budgeting and profitability. There were traditional manual types of constructing cost estimating but with time, it became more technology driven with both advancing technology and change in content of construction cost estimating. In this paper, traditional versus modern estimating methods are compared and the pros and cons of these methods are discussed. However, gross error found in traditional methods, such as analogous and parametric estimating, lacks simplicity and precision. On the other hand, modern ways, such as BIM and the AI based techniques, are offering increased accuracy and efficiency, but these pose complexity, cost overhead, and training issues. Through this analysis, the study emphasizes the need for blending of the paradigms of traditional and modern methods in the estimation of construction project. Three case studies in real world construction projects that have used both traditional and modern estimating techniques are used to further support the findings in the paper.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21275/sr241023231113
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Traditional vs. Modern Estimating Methods: Pros and Cons of Different Approaches in Construction

Abhiram Reddy Anireddy
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
BIM and Construction Integration
article

Comparative Analysis of Traditional vs. Modern Estimating Methods: Pros and Cons of Different Approaches in Construction

Abhiram Reddy Anireddy
article en

Abstract

In construction project cycle, accurate cost estimation is key that plays a major role in project feasibility, budgeting and profitability. There were traditional manual types of constructing cost estimating but with time, it became more technology driven with both advancing technology and change in content of construction cost estimating. In this paper, traditional versus modern estimating methods are compared and the pros and cons of these methods are discussed. However, gross error found in traditional methods, such as analogous and parametric estimating, lacks simplicity and precision. On the other hand, modern ways, such as BIM and the AI based techniques, are offering increased accuracy and efficiency, but these pose complexity, cost overhead, and training issues. Through this analysis, the study emphasizes the need for blending of the paradigms of traditional and modern methods in the estimation of construction project. Three case studies in real world construction projects that have used both traditional and modern estimating techniques are used to further support the findings in the paper.

International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)Vol. 13(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Traditional vs. Modern Estimating Methods: Pros and Cons of Different Approaches in Construction — Abhiram Reddy Anireddy · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS