Biodiversity and cultural diversity are morally valued

Humanity is facing rapid declines in both biodiversity and cultural diversity. As effective conservation policies often require strong public support, it is critical to understand whether individuals view diversity loss through a moral lens and whether they value diversity for its own sake, independent from instrumental or individual-centric concerns. Across two studies (N = 796), we found that individuals assigned moral value to both biodiversity and cultural diversity. Individuals assigned greater moral value to animals, plants and - to a lesser extent - languages when diversity was threatened, compared to when it was not threatened, despite an equal number of entities at risk, and they were willing to sacrifice a large number of these entities to prevent a loss in diversity. Additionally, we found (N = 12,000) that a general concern for diversity underlies concern for both biodiversity and cultural diversity. These findings suggest that emphasizing the inherent value of diversity may be effective for increasing public support for conservation of diversity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12818
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Animal and Plant Science Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biodiversity and cultural diversity are morally valued

Jolanda Jetten, Christoph Klebl, Brock Bastian, Julia Lee
2 citations
British Journal of Social Psychology
Animal and Plant Science Education
1.29
article

Biodiversity and cultural diversity are morally valued

Jolanda Jetten, Christoph Klebl, Brock Bastian, Julia Lee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Humanity is facing rapid declines in both biodiversity and cultural diversity. As effective conservation policies often require strong public support, it is critical to understand whether individuals view diversity loss through a moral lens and whether they value diversity for its own sake, independent from instrumental or individual-centric concerns. Across two studies (N = 796), we found that individuals assigned moral value to both biodiversity and cultural diversity. Individuals assigned greater moral value to animals, plants and - to a lesser extent - languages when diversity was threatened, compared to when it was not threatened, despite an equal number of entities at risk, and they were willing to sacrifice a large number of these entities to prevent a loss in diversity. Additionally, we found (N = 12,000) that a general concern for diversity underlies concern for both biodiversity and cultural diversity. These findings suggest that emphasizing the inherent value of diversity may be effective for increasing public support for conservation of diversity.

British Journal of Social PsychologyVol. 64(1)
The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Michigan (US), Michigan United (US)
National Geographic Society, Australian Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Animal and Plant Science Education
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Biodiversity and cultural diversity are morally valued — Jolanda Jetten, Christoph Klebl, et al. · British Journal of Social Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS