Politicians’ Theories of Voting Behavior

While political scientists regularly engage in spirited theoretical debates about elections and voting behavior, few have noticed that elected politicians also have theories of elections and voting. Here, we investigate politicians’ positions on eight central theoretical debates in the area of elections and voting behavior and compare politicians’ theories to those held by ordinary citizens. Using data from face-to-face interviews with nearly one thousand politicians in 11 countries, together with corresponding surveys of more than twelve thousand citizens, we show that politicians overwhelmingly hold thin, minimalist, “democratic realist” theories of voting, while citizens’ theories are more optimistic and policy oriented. Politicians’ theoretical tendencies—along with their theoretical misalignment from citizens—are remarkably consistent across countries. These theories are likely to have important consequences for how politicians campaign, communicate with the public, think about public policy, and represent their constituents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055424001060
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Politicians’ Theories of Voting Behavior

Anne Rasmussen, Peter John Loewen, Mikael Persson, Patrick Dumont et al.
14 citations
American Political Science Review
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
31.24
article

Politicians’ Theories of Voting Behavior

Anne Rasmussen, Peter John Loewen, Mikael Persson, Patrick Dumont, Jack Lucas, Jean‐Benoît Pilet, Lior Sheffer, Christian Breunig, Stefaan Walgrave, Nathalie Brack, Sarah Lachance, Eran Amsalem, Stefanie Bailer, Miguel M. Pereira, Pirmin Bundi, Frédéric Varone, Karolin Soontjens, Linda Coufal, Maj-Britt Sterba
article en
14 citations

Abstract

While political scientists regularly engage in spirited theoretical debates about elections and voting behavior, few have noticed that elected politicians also have theories of elections and voting. Here, we investigate politicians’ positions on eight central theoretical debates in the area of elections and voting behavior and compare politicians’ theories to those held by ordinary citizens. Using data from face-to-face interviews with nearly one thousand politicians in 11 countries, together with corresponding surveys of more than twelve thousand citizens, we show that politicians overwhelmingly hold thin, minimalist, “democratic realist” theories of voting, while citizens’ theories are more optimistic and policy oriented. Politicians’ theoretical tendencies—along with their theoretical misalignment from citizens—are remarkably consistent across countries. These theories are likely to have important consequences for how politicians campaign, communicate with the public, think about public policy, and represent their constituents.

American Political Science ReviewVol. 119(3)
University of Geneva (CH), Australian National University (AU), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), University of Antwerp (BE), Tel Aviv University (IL), University of Calgary (CA), King's College London (GB), University of Basel (CH), University of Konstanz (DE), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Cornell University (US), Charles University (CZ), University of Gothenburg (SE), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), University of Lausanne (CH)
University of Southern California, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Universität Basel, University of Cambridge, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Vetenskapsrådet, Tel Aviv University, Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond, Universitetet i Bergen, Göteborgs Universitet, Universidade de Lisboa, Université de Genève, Université de Lausanne, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd, Universiteit Antwerpen, Universität Konstanz, Vlaamse regering, Wageningen University and Research
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
31.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.