Interpreting Step‐Drawdown Pumping Test Undergoing Confined‐Unconfined Conversion with Well Loss

The step-drawdown pumping test often experiences a transition from confined to unconfined conditions due to the continuously increasing pumping rate. However, the current well hydraulics model has not accurately interpreted this phenomenon. In this study, we developed an analytical solution to address the confined-unconfined conversion in step-drawdown pumping tests based on Girinskii's potential and superposition theory. Additionally, a field step-drawdown pumping test featuring confined-unconfined conversion was conducted to apply the proposed analytical solution. The particle swarm optimization algorithm was employed to simultaneously estimate multiple parameters. The results demonstrate that the newly proposed solution provides a better fit to the observed drawdown in the pumping well compared to previous models. The hydrogeological parameters (K, S), well loss coefficient (B), and critical time for confined-unconfined conversion (t<sub>c</sub>) were estimated to be K = 7.15 m/d, S = 6.65 × 10<sup>-5</sup>, B = 7.48 × 10<sup>-6</sup>, and t<sub>c</sub> = 1152 min, respectively. Neglecting the confined-unconfined conversion in step-drawdown pumping tests leads to underestimation of drawdown inside the pumping well due to an overestimation of the aquifer thickness. After the conversion from confined to unconfined conditions, the estimated well loss coefficient decreased by 88% compared to its pre-conversion value. This highlights the necessity of adjusting the well loss coefficient in the step-drawdown pumping test model to account for confined-unconfined conversion. In summary, this study introduces a new method for interpreting parameters in step-drawdown pumping tests and provides field validation for its effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ground Water
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13450
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting Step‐Drawdown Pumping Test Undergoing Confined‐Unconfined Conversion with Well Loss

Lu Zhang, Zhang Wen, Hua Zhao, Yizhao Wang et al.
3 links
Ground Water
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
article

Interpreting Step‐Drawdown Pumping Test Undergoing Confined‐Unconfined Conversion with Well Loss

Lu Zhang, Zhang Wen, Hua Zhao, Yizhao Wang, Ling Wang, Na Li, Dian Wang, Jianmei Liu, Qi Zhu
article en

Abstract

The step-drawdown pumping test often experiences a transition from confined to unconfined conditions due to the continuously increasing pumping rate. However, the current well hydraulics model has not accurately interpreted this phenomenon. In this study, we developed an analytical solution to address the confined-unconfined conversion in step-drawdown pumping tests based on Girinskii's potential and superposition theory. Additionally, a field step-drawdown pumping test featuring confined-unconfined conversion was conducted to apply the proposed analytical solution. The particle swarm optimization algorithm was employed to simultaneously estimate multiple parameters. The results demonstrate that the newly proposed solution provides a better fit to the observed drawdown in the pumping well compared to previous models. The hydrogeological parameters (K, S), well loss coefficient (B), and critical time for confined-unconfined conversion (t<sub>c</sub>) were estimated to be K = 7.15 m/d, S = 6.65 × 10<sup>-5</sup>, B = 7.48 × 10<sup>-6</sup>, and t<sub>c</sub> = 1152 min, respectively. Neglecting the confined-unconfined conversion in step-drawdown pumping tests leads to underestimation of drawdown inside the pumping well due to an overestimation of the aquifer thickness. After the conversion from confined to unconfined conditions, the estimated well loss coefficient decreased by 88% compared to its pre-conversion value. This highlights the necessity of adjusting the well loss coefficient in the step-drawdown pumping test model to account for confined-unconfined conversion. In summary, this study introduces a new method for interpreting parameters in step-drawdown pumping tests and provides field validation for its effectiveness.

Ground WaterVol. 63(2)
China University of Geosciences (CN), Hunan Hydro&Power Design Institute (CN), Guangzhou Metro Group (China) (CN), Guangzhou Metro Design & Research Institute
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.