Comparing the accuracy of 3D urban olive tree models detected by smartphone using LiDAR sensor, photogrammetry and NeRF: a case study of ’Ascolana Tenera’ in Italy

Abstract. Rapid urban growth makes green space management crucial to improve citizens’ well-being. Urban olive trees characterize the Italian landscapes and their culture. This study explores different methodologies for urban tree assessment in this context, using an iPhone 14 Pro Max. These included: 1) its integrated Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor using the Recon3D app, 2) its camera with Structure from Motion (SfM) techniques, and 3) its camera for generating 3D models using Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF). Additionally, a professional Mobile Laser Scanner (MLS), was used for comparison. Total height (H), canopy base height (CBH) and canopy volume (CV) measurements were extracted using both CloudCompare and allometric formulas. The main aim of this paper is to compare the 3D models of olive trees obtained from low-cost sensors with those generated from the MLS, which is a more accurate device but comes with significantly higher costs. The results, in terms of RMSE (iPhone LiDAR - H: 0.46 m, CBH: 0.12 m, CV: 15.66 m3; iPhone-SfM - H: 0.95 m, CBH: 0.19 m, CV: 25.85 m3; iPhone-NeRF - H: 1.26 m, CBH: 0.31 m, CV: 33.79 m3), bias and volume differences, reveal that the smartphone, in all the methodologies, tends to underestimate measurements as the size of the trees increases. This is due to the higher MLS range of acquisition. Despite these limitations, low-cost solutions like smartphone-based methods can be a viable alternative given their economic accessibility.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-x-3-2024-61-2024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the accuracy of 3D urban olive tree models detected by smartphone using LiDAR sensor, photogrammetry and NeRF: a case study of ’Ascolana Tenera’ in Italy

Mattia Balestra, Stefano Chiappini, Eva Savina Malinverni, Roberto Pierdicca et al.
2 citations
ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.41
article

Comparing the accuracy of 3D urban olive tree models detected by smartphone using LiDAR sensor, photogrammetry and NeRF: a case study of ’Ascolana Tenera’ in Italy

Mattia Balestra, Stefano Chiappini, Eva Savina Malinverni, Roberto Pierdicca, Ernesto Marcheggiani, Federico Giulioni
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Rapid urban growth makes green space management crucial to improve citizens’ well-being. Urban olive trees characterize the Italian landscapes and their culture. This study explores different methodologies for urban tree assessment in this context, using an iPhone 14 Pro Max. These included: 1) its integrated Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) sensor using the Recon3D app, 2) its camera with Structure from Motion (SfM) techniques, and 3) its camera for generating 3D models using Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF). Additionally, a professional Mobile Laser Scanner (MLS), was used for comparison. Total height (H), canopy base height (CBH) and canopy volume (CV) measurements were extracted using both CloudCompare and allometric formulas. The main aim of this paper is to compare the 3D models of olive trees obtained from low-cost sensors with those generated from the MLS, which is a more accurate device but comes with significantly higher costs. The results, in terms of RMSE (iPhone LiDAR - H: 0.46 m, CBH: 0.12 m, CV: 15.66 m3; iPhone-SfM - H: 0.95 m, CBH: 0.19 m, CV: 25.85 m3; iPhone-NeRF - H: 1.26 m, CBH: 0.31 m, CV: 33.79 m3), bias and volume differences, reveal that the smartphone, in all the methodologies, tends to underestimate measurements as the size of the trees increases. This is due to the higher MLS range of acquisition. Despite these limitations, low-cost solutions like smartphone-based methods can be a viable alternative given their economic accessibility.

ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. X-3-2024
European Commission, Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.