Implementing without evaluating: The missing link in understanding the effectiveness of financial incentive programs for e-bikes

The surging popularity of electric bicycles aligns with global objectives for active and sustainable mobility, a cornerstone of transportation policy. However, persistent barriers such as inadequate infrastructure and safety concerns, coupled with the steep cost of e-bikes, hinder their widespread adoption. To address the latter issue, various financial incentive programs have been implemented with the aim of increasing e-bike use. This review synthesises existing evidence to assess the effectiveness of these incentives in promoting modal shift to e-bikes. The review highlights the scarcity of published evidence on the effectiveness of financial incentive programs, which limits our understanding of the most effective design and structure of such schemes to inform policy. Despite this, findings from available studies indicate an increase in e-bike use and a corresponding decrease in car use among participants in the reviewed programs. There is a critical need for more rigorous studies, preferably employing experimental or quasi-experimental longitudinal designs, to comprehensively assess the effectiveness of e-bike financial incentive programs in delivering e-bike uptake and modal shift away from cars. • Significant lack of robust evaluations on e-bike financial incentive effectiveness. • Existing financial incentives increase e-bike use and reduce car dependency. • Urgent need for rigorous studies to assess and design effective e-bike incentives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105528
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing without evaluating: The missing link in understanding the effectiveness of financial incentive programs for e-bikes

Debjit Bhowmick, Thao Thai, Lauren Pearson, Ben Beck et al.
5 citations
Cities
Urban Transport and Accessibility
3.42
article

Implementing without evaluating: The missing link in understanding the effectiveness of financial incentive programs for e-bikes

Debjit Bhowmick, Thao Thai, Lauren Pearson, Ben Beck, Hossein Nosratzadeh, Ana Belén Ríos Carmona, Jason Thompson
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The surging popularity of electric bicycles aligns with global objectives for active and sustainable mobility, a cornerstone of transportation policy. However, persistent barriers such as inadequate infrastructure and safety concerns, coupled with the steep cost of e-bikes, hinder their widespread adoption. To address the latter issue, various financial incentive programs have been implemented with the aim of increasing e-bike use. This review synthesises existing evidence to assess the effectiveness of these incentives in promoting modal shift to e-bikes. The review highlights the scarcity of published evidence on the effectiveness of financial incentive programs, which limits our understanding of the most effective design and structure of such schemes to inform policy. Despite this, findings from available studies indicate an increase in e-bike use and a corresponding decrease in car use among participants in the reviewed programs. There is a critical need for more rigorous studies, preferably employing experimental or quasi-experimental longitudinal designs, to comprehensively assess the effectiveness of e-bike financial incentive programs in delivering e-bike uptake and modal shift away from cars. • Significant lack of robust evaluations on e-bike financial incentive effectiveness. • Existing financial incentives increase e-bike use and reduce car dependency. • Urgent need for rigorous studies to assess and design effective e-bike incentives.

CitiesVol. 156
The University of Melbourne (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), Monash University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Australian Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
3.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.