Comparison and AI-based prediction of graph comprehension skills based on the visual strategies of first-year physics and medicine students

Graphical representations of data are common in many disciplines. Previous research has found that physics students appear to have better graph comprehension skills than students from social science disciplines, regardless of the task context. However, the graph comprehension skills of physics students have not yet been compared with (veterinary) medicine students, both of which are disciplines that require multiple science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses. This study extends previous research on this subject by exploring whether physics majors possess superior graph comprehension skills due to their study discipline. Here, participants solved 24 graph comprehension tasks across various subjects, including mathematics, physics, and medicine; these tests were conducted at the beginning and end of their first semester. Graph comprehension gain was calculated based on the percentage of correct and incorrect answers in the pretest and the post-test. In addition to these comparisons, we replicated previous research that successfully distinguished correct and incorrect solvers based on their visual behavior by using a novel machine-learning method tailored to small datasets. Through this replication of statistical analyses, we aim to ensure the reliability of adaptive learning systems in the future, regardless of data size, using the same machine-learning method. Physics and medical students were found to exhibit relatively similar graph comprehension gain; this is in contrast to previous research comparing physics and non-STEM students. Our results also revealed that both physics and medical students use similar visual strategies to solve these tasks. However, correct and incorrect solvers could be distinguished via machine-learning methods regardless of their discipline. Our research suggests that visual behavior is a good predictor of graph comprehension skills. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.020138
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison and AI-based prediction of graph comprehension skills based on the visual strategies of first-year physics and medicine students

Daniela Kugelmann, J. Schreiber, Jochen Kühn, Markus Berndt et al.
5 citations
Physical Review Physics Education Research
Online Learning and Analytics
2.06
article

Comparison and AI-based prediction of graph comprehension skills based on the visual strategies of first-year physics and medicine students

Daniela Kugelmann, J. Schreiber, Jochen Kühn, Markus Berndt, Stefan Küchemann, Yavuz Dinc, Verena Ruf, Martin R. Fischer, Steffen Steinert, J. Bortfeldt
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Graphical representations of data are common in many disciplines. Previous research has found that physics students appear to have better graph comprehension skills than students from social science disciplines, regardless of the task context. However, the graph comprehension skills of physics students have not yet been compared with (veterinary) medicine students, both of which are disciplines that require multiple science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses. This study extends previous research on this subject by exploring whether physics majors possess superior graph comprehension skills due to their study discipline. Here, participants solved 24 graph comprehension tasks across various subjects, including mathematics, physics, and medicine; these tests were conducted at the beginning and end of their first semester. Graph comprehension gain was calculated based on the percentage of correct and incorrect answers in the pretest and the post-test. In addition to these comparisons, we replicated previous research that successfully distinguished correct and incorrect solvers based on their visual behavior by using a novel machine-learning method tailored to small datasets. Through this replication of statistical analyses, we aim to ensure the reliability of adaptive learning systems in the future, regardless of data size, using the same machine-learning method. Physics and medical students were found to exhibit relatively similar graph comprehension gain; this is in contrast to previous research comparing physics and non-STEM students. Our results also revealed that both physics and medical students use similar visual strategies to solve these tasks. However, correct and incorrect solvers could be distinguished via machine-learning methods regardless of their discipline. Our research suggests that visual behavior is a good predictor of graph comprehension skills. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Physical Review Physics Education ResearchVol. 20(2)
University of Kaiserslautern (DE), University of Koblenz and Landau (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Online Learning and Analytics
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.