Environmental impacts of drugs against parasitic vector-borne diseases and the need to integrate sustainability into their development and use

<ns3:p> Background The current scientific discourse on environmental impacts of veterinary medicines mostly focuses on ectoparasiticides. Meanwhile, the environmental impacts of widely prescribed drugs for the treatment of human and animal parasitic vector-borne diseases (PVBD) remain largely unexplored. There is thus a need for evidence-based information to support guidelines and protocols for sustainable One Health PVBD drug development and use, while promoting greener research practices. Here, we reflect on the potential environmental impacts of PVBD drugs in current use, and the environmental impact of our research practices for developing new antiparasitics. Methods We conducted a survey of the membership of the “One Health drugs against parasitic vector borne diseases in Europe and beyond” Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action 21111 (OneHealth <ns3:italic>drugs</ns3:italic> ) to assess the current appreciation of sustainable drug design concepts and the extent to which One Health and sustainability principles are integrated into PVBD drug discovery and development. The survey also explored which human, technical, and funding resources are currently used in Europe and neighbouring countries in PVBD drugs research. Results The survey was conducted and analysed by OneHealth <ns3:italic>drugs</ns3:italic> and garnered 89 respondents, representing a response rate of 66% from 32 countries, predominantly European. 87% of participating collaborators worked in Academia; research groups were small (60% with 1–4 researchers) and mostly consist of few researchers, mostly at early career stages (63% &lt;35 years old). Collaborations were mostly between academics, and 60% collaborated with non-European researchers, while funding was mostly from national governments. Motivation for greener research practices was high but there was as yet low implementation of green strategies or the incorporation of ecotoxicological test in drug development workflows, due to cost and unfamiliarity. Conclusions We highlight the need for early-ecotoxicological testing of new drug candidates and suggest best practices as we move towards standardized protocols in developing safe and efficacious PVBD drugs. </ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Europe
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18008.2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Insect Utilization and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental impacts of drugs against parasitic vector-borne diseases and the need to integrate sustainability into their development and use

Clara Lima, Elisa Uliassi, Luı́s Cardoso, Maria Paola Costi et al.
3 citations
Open Research Europe
Insect Utilization and Effects
1.62
article

Environmental impacts of drugs against parasitic vector-borne diseases and the need to integrate sustainability into their development and use

Clara Lima, Elisa Uliassi, Luı́s Cardoso, Maria Paola Costi, Anabela Cordeiro‐da‐Silva, Michael G. Bertram, Eli S.J. Thoré
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<ns3:p> Background The current scientific discourse on environmental impacts of veterinary medicines mostly focuses on ectoparasiticides. Meanwhile, the environmental impacts of widely prescribed drugs for the treatment of human and animal parasitic vector-borne diseases (PVBD) remain largely unexplored. There is thus a need for evidence-based information to support guidelines and protocols for sustainable One Health PVBD drug development and use, while promoting greener research practices. Here, we reflect on the potential environmental impacts of PVBD drugs in current use, and the environmental impact of our research practices for developing new antiparasitics. Methods We conducted a survey of the membership of the “One Health drugs against parasitic vector borne diseases in Europe and beyond” Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action 21111 (OneHealth <ns3:italic>drugs</ns3:italic> ) to assess the current appreciation of sustainable drug design concepts and the extent to which One Health and sustainability principles are integrated into PVBD drug discovery and development. The survey also explored which human, technical, and funding resources are currently used in Europe and neighbouring countries in PVBD drugs research. Results The survey was conducted and analysed by OneHealth <ns3:italic>drugs</ns3:italic> and garnered 89 respondents, representing a response rate of 66% from 32 countries, predominantly European. 87% of participating collaborators worked in Academia; research groups were small (60% with 1–4 researchers) and mostly consist of few researchers, mostly at early career stages (63% &lt;35 years old). Collaborations were mostly between academics, and 60% collaborated with non-European researchers, while funding was mostly from national governments. Motivation for greener research practices was high but there was as yet low implementation of green strategies or the incorporation of ecotoxicological test in drug development workflows, due to cost and unfamiliarity. Conclusions We highlight the need for early-ecotoxicological testing of new drug candidates and suggest best practices as we move towards standardized protocols in developing safe and efficacious PVBD drugs. </ns3:p>

Open Research EuropeVol. 4
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Namur (BE), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT), Stockholm University (SE), Universidade do Porto (PT), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto (PT), Monash University (AU), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Bologna (IT)
Kempe Foundation, European Commission, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Vetenskapsrådet, Kempestiftelserna, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Insect Utilization and Effects
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.