Bringing Together Two Paradigms of Nonequilibrium: Fragile versus Robust Aging in Driven Glassy Systems

There are two key paradigms for nonequilibrium dynamics: on the one hand, aging toward an equilibrium state that cannot be reached on reasonable timescales; on the other, external driving that can lead to nonequilibrium steady states. We explore how these two mechanisms interact by studying the behavior of trap models, which are paradigmatic descriptions of slow glassy dynamics, when driven by trajectory bias toward high or low activity. To diagnose whether the driven systems continue to age, we establish a framework for mapping the biased dynamics to a Markovian time evolution with time-dependent transition rates. We find that the original aging dynamics reacts in two qualitatively distinct ways to the driving: it can be destroyed by the driving of any nonzero strength ("fragile" aging), whereby the dynamics either reaches an active steady state or effectively freezes, or it can persist within a finite range of driving strengths around the undriven case ("robust" aging). This classification into fragile and robust aging could form the basis for distinguishing different universality classes of aging dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Letters
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.133.197101
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Material Dynamics and Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bringing Together Two Paradigms of Nonequilibrium: Fragile versus Robust Aging in Driven Glassy Systems

Charles Marteau, Diego Tapias, Fabián Aguirre-López, Peter Sollich
3 citations
Physical Review Letters
Material Dynamics and Properties
0.35
article

Bringing Together Two Paradigms of Nonequilibrium: Fragile versus Robust Aging in Driven Glassy Systems

Charles Marteau, Diego Tapias, Fabián Aguirre-López, Peter Sollich
article en
3 citations

Abstract

There are two key paradigms for nonequilibrium dynamics: on the one hand, aging toward an equilibrium state that cannot be reached on reasonable timescales; on the other, external driving that can lead to nonequilibrium steady states. We explore how these two mechanisms interact by studying the behavior of trap models, which are paradigmatic descriptions of slow glassy dynamics, when driven by trajectory bias toward high or low activity. To diagnose whether the driven systems continue to age, we establish a framework for mapping the biased dynamics to a Markovian time evolution with time-dependent transition rates. We find that the original aging dynamics reacts in two qualitatively distinct ways to the driving: it can be destroyed by the driving of any nonzero strength ("fragile" aging), whereby the dynamics either reaches an active steady state or effectively freezes, or it can persist within a finite range of driving strengths around the undriven case ("robust" aging). This classification into fragile and robust aging could form the basis for distinguishing different universality classes of aging dynamics.

Physical Review LettersVol. 133(19)
University of British Columbia (CA), École Polytechnique (FR), King's College London (GB), University of Göttingen (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Material Dynamics and Properties
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.