Design, development, and evaluation of the organic chemistry representational competence assessment (ORCA)

This paper describes the design and evaluation of the O̲rganic chemistry R̲epresentational C̲ompetence A̲ssessment (ORCA). Grounded in Kozma and Russell's representational competence framework, the ORCA measures the learner's ability to interpret , translate , and use six commonly used representations of molecular structure (condensed structures, Lewis structures, skeletal structures, wedge-dash diagrams, Newman projections, and chair conformations). Semi-structured interviews with 38 first-semester organic chemistry learners informed the development of the ORCA items. The ORCA was developed and refined through three pilot administrations involving a total of 3477 first-semester organic chemistry students from multiple institutions. The final version of the ORCA was completed by 1494 students across five institutions. Various analyses provided evidence for the validity and reliability of the data generated by the assessment. Both one-factor and three-factor correlated structures were explored via confirmatory factor analysis. The one-factor model better captured the underlying structure of the data, which suggests that representational competence is better evaluated as a unified construct rather than as distinct, separate skills. The ORCA data reveal that the representational competence skills are interconnected and should consistently be reinforced throughout the organic chemistry course.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00188a
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design, development, and evaluation of the organic chemistry representational competence assessment (ORCA)

Regis Komperda, Fridah Rotich, Maia Popova, Lyniesha Ward et al.
11 citations
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
Science Education and Pedagogy
23.05
article

Design, development, and evaluation of the organic chemistry representational competence assessment (ORCA)

Regis Komperda, Fridah Rotich, Maia Popova, Lyniesha Ward, Jeffrey R. Raker, Sachin Nedungadi
article en
11 citations

Abstract

This paper describes the design and evaluation of the O̲rganic chemistry R̲epresentational C̲ompetence A̲ssessment (ORCA). Grounded in Kozma and Russell's representational competence framework, the ORCA measures the learner's ability to interpret , translate , and use six commonly used representations of molecular structure (condensed structures, Lewis structures, skeletal structures, wedge-dash diagrams, Newman projections, and chair conformations). Semi-structured interviews with 38 first-semester organic chemistry learners informed the development of the ORCA items. The ORCA was developed and refined through three pilot administrations involving a total of 3477 first-semester organic chemistry students from multiple institutions. The final version of the ORCA was completed by 1494 students across five institutions. Various analyses provided evidence for the validity and reliability of the data generated by the assessment. Both one-factor and three-factor correlated structures were explored via confirmatory factor analysis. The one-factor model better captured the underlying structure of the data, which suggests that representational competence is better evaluated as a unified construct rather than as distinct, separate skills. The ORCA data reveal that the representational competence skills are interconnected and should consistently be reinforced throughout the organic chemistry course.

Chemistry Education Research and PracticeVol. 26(1)
University of Nebraska at Omaha (US), University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), University of South Florida (US), San Diego State University (US)
Division of Undergraduate Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Science Education and Pedagogy
23.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.