Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of Area

This study explored 10 prospective teachers’ (PTs’) understanding of the area of a rectangular region using square and non-square rectangular area-units. In an hour-long interview, each PT was first asked to explain how they would find the area of a given rectangular region in terms of a non-square notecard. For several PTs, this task prompted discussion of a square unit defined by the edge of the notecard. In a second task, PTs were presented with a rectangular array of squares and were asked to explain to a fictional child why multiplying length times width does not count the top left corner square twice. An analysis of transcripts of the interview suggested three conceptual components to understanding the area of a rectangular region—area-units, multiplication, and their connection to the length times width formula. Based on the PTs’ responses, we propose multi-tiered levels of reasoning. Each new level of understanding was built on the prior level in a hierarchical fashion. Juxtaposing tasks involving different area-units revealed PTs’ thinking about non-square and square area-units and how these related to the formula “L × W”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111216
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of Area

Betsy McNeal, Sayonita Ghosh Hajra, Michael T. Battista, Ayse Ozturk
1 citations
Education Sciences
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
2.10
article

Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of Area

Betsy McNeal, Sayonita Ghosh Hajra, Michael T. Battista, Ayse Ozturk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explored 10 prospective teachers’ (PTs’) understanding of the area of a rectangular region using square and non-square rectangular area-units. In an hour-long interview, each PT was first asked to explain how they would find the area of a given rectangular region in terms of a non-square notecard. For several PTs, this task prompted discussion of a square unit defined by the edge of the notecard. In a second task, PTs were presented with a rectangular array of squares and were asked to explain to a fictional child why multiplying length times width does not count the top left corner square twice. An analysis of transcripts of the interview suggested three conceptual components to understanding the area of a rectangular region—area-units, multiplication, and their connection to the length times width formula. Based on the PTs’ responses, we propose multi-tiered levels of reasoning. Each new level of understanding was built on the prior level in a hierarchical fashion. Juxtaposing tasks involving different area-units revealed PTs’ thinking about non-square and square area-units and how these related to the formula “L × W”.

Education SciencesVol. 14(11)
California State University, Sacramento (US), The Ohio State University (US), Old Dominion University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.