Dual-Fluoroscopy vs. Single-Fluoroscopy in Balloon Kyphoplasty: A Study of Efficiency and Safety

<b>Background:</b> Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most prevalent type of osteoporotic fractures, often causing significant pain, morbidity, and mortality. Vertebral augmentation procedures like balloon kyphoplasty (BK) are effective in treating VCFs. These procedures are typically performed using a single fluoroscopy machine (SF) for anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. We have implemented a dual-fluoroscopy (DF) technique to reduce procedure time and radiation exposure. The goal of this study was to determine whether dual-fluoroscopy could optimize surgical efficiency without compromising safety, offering a more effective alternative to traditional single-fluoroscopy methods. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 126 patients who underwent BK with either SF (n = 74, 58.7%) or DF (n = 52, 41.3%) between 2020 and 2024. We collected data on procedure duration per pedicle (PDPP), radiation exposure (reference air kerma and dose-area product [DAP]), and radiation duration. A sub-analysis of post-learning phase cases was performed. <b>Results:</b> A learning curve was identified for the first 24 cases and 15 cases using the SF technique and DF technique, respectively, which was followed by a stabilization in procedure duration per pedicle (Levene's statistic = 10.623, <i>p</i> = 0.002 for SD difference, <i>p</i> < 0.001 for mean PDPP difference). After the completion of the learning phase for both techniques, the DF group demonstrated a significantly shorter PDPP (11.83 ± 4.3 vs. 14.03 ± 5.57 min, <i>p</i> = 0.049). No significant differences were found in radiation exposure, including radiation duration (<i>p</i> = 0.577), reference air kerma, or DAP. <b>Conclusions:</b> Dual-fluoroscopy significantly reduces procedure time after the learning curve is overcome, improving efficiency without increasing radiation exposure. This technique holds promise for optimizing kyphoplasty workflow and safety, supporting broader clinical adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216608
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual-Fluoroscopy vs. Single-Fluoroscopy in Balloon Kyphoplasty: A Study of Efficiency and Safety

Refael Behrbalk, Roy Romem, D. Schleifer, Yuval Baruch et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Dual-Fluoroscopy vs. Single-Fluoroscopy in Balloon Kyphoplasty: A Study of Efficiency and Safety

Refael Behrbalk, Roy Romem, D. Schleifer, Yuval Baruch, Itzhak Engel, David Segal, Jonathan E. J. Koch, Nissim Ohana
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are the most prevalent type of osteoporotic fractures, often causing significant pain, morbidity, and mortality. Vertebral augmentation procedures like balloon kyphoplasty (BK) are effective in treating VCFs. These procedures are typically performed using a single fluoroscopy machine (SF) for anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views. We have implemented a dual-fluoroscopy (DF) technique to reduce procedure time and radiation exposure. The goal of this study was to determine whether dual-fluoroscopy could optimize surgical efficiency without compromising safety, offering a more effective alternative to traditional single-fluoroscopy methods. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 126 patients who underwent BK with either SF (n = 74, 58.7%) or DF (n = 52, 41.3%) between 2020 and 2024. We collected data on procedure duration per pedicle (PDPP), radiation exposure (reference air kerma and dose-area product [DAP]), and radiation duration. A sub-analysis of post-learning phase cases was performed. <b>Results:</b> A learning curve was identified for the first 24 cases and 15 cases using the SF technique and DF technique, respectively, which was followed by a stabilization in procedure duration per pedicle (Levene's statistic = 10.623, <i>p</i> = 0.002 for SD difference, <i>p</i> < 0.001 for mean PDPP difference). After the completion of the learning phase for both techniques, the DF group demonstrated a significantly shorter PDPP (11.83 ± 4.3 vs. 14.03 ± 5.57 min, <i>p</i> = 0.049). No significant differences were found in radiation exposure, including radiation duration (<i>p</i> = 0.577), reference air kerma, or DAP. <b>Conclusions:</b> Dual-fluoroscopy significantly reduces procedure time after the learning curve is overcome, improving efficiency without increasing radiation exposure. This technique holds promise for optimizing kyphoplasty workflow and safety, supporting broader clinical adoption.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(21)
Meir Medical Center (IL), Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.