Translation of Systematic Review LibGuide Content Using Plain Language and Scientific Writing Best Practices

This report describes the incorporation of plain language and scientific communication best practices to supplement and simplify complex terminology and processes described on a highly utilized Systematic Review LibGuide. Guide content was evaluated pre- and post-revision using established metrics for readability, understandability, and actionability. The quality improvement process described in this report is accessible and feasible for other librarians to complete. Regardless of topic, if LibGuides are publicly available, it is important to ensure content is understandable by users, no matter their background or expertise, to ensure equitable access of information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Reference Services Quarterly
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2024.2395228
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic Writing and Publishing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation of Systematic Review LibGuide Content Using Plain Language and Scientific Writing Best Practices

H. Jackson Burrows, Elizabeth Moreton, Emily P. Jones, Terri Ottosen et al.
1 citations
Medical Reference Services Quarterly
Academic Writing and Publishing
6.04
article

Translation of Systematic Review LibGuide Content Using Plain Language and Scientific Writing Best Practices

H. Jackson Burrows, Elizabeth Moreton, Emily P. Jones, Terri Ottosen, Sophie Nachman, Luke Barron
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This report describes the incorporation of plain language and scientific communication best practices to supplement and simplify complex terminology and processes described on a highly utilized Systematic Review LibGuide. Guide content was evaluated pre- and post-revision using established metrics for readability, understandability, and actionability. The quality improvement process described in this report is accessible and feasible for other librarians to complete. Regardless of topic, if LibGuides are publicly available, it is important to ensure content is understandable by users, no matter their background or expertise, to ensure equitable access of information.

Medical Reference Services QuarterlyVol. 43(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Academic Writing and Publishing
6.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.