Options for future European reusable booster stages: evaluation and comparison of VTHL and VTVL return methods

Abstract In the past, the majority of system studies on reusable space transportation performed within Europe focused on concepts relying on lift-generating wings for recovery. Recently, vertically landing concepts similar to those deployed successfully by SpaceX have moved to the center of technical attention. Both recovery and landing strategies have their pros and cons and it is not obvious what would be a sound choice for Europe. Therefore, the German Aerospace Center DLR initiated a parametric system study, named ENTRAIN, that evaluates the impact of different return options on the launcher design on a technical level: the vertical take-off, vertical landing method (VTVL) as used by SpaceX compared to the vertical take-off, horizontal landing (VTHL) method as used for the Space Shuttle. Within this study, launchers were designed using different propellant combinations, staging velocities and engine cycles. The designed launchers are evaluated in this paper regarding performance, technical difficulties, operational aspects, size, mass and complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CEAS Space Journal
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12567-024-00571-x
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Options for future European reusable booster stages: evaluation and comparison of VTHL and VTVL return methods

Sven Stappert, Ingrid Dietlein, Leonid Bussler, Martin Sippel et al.
7 citations
CEAS Space Journal
Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
0.72
article

Options for future European reusable booster stages: evaluation and comparison of VTHL and VTVL return methods

Sven Stappert, Ingrid Dietlein, Leonid Bussler, Martin Sippel, Jascha Wilken
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the past, the majority of system studies on reusable space transportation performed within Europe focused on concepts relying on lift-generating wings for recovery. Recently, vertically landing concepts similar to those deployed successfully by SpaceX have moved to the center of technical attention. Both recovery and landing strategies have their pros and cons and it is not obvious what would be a sound choice for Europe. Therefore, the German Aerospace Center DLR initiated a parametric system study, named ENTRAIN, that evaluates the impact of different return options on the launcher design on a technical level: the vertical take-off, vertical landing method (VTVL) as used by SpaceX compared to the vertical take-off, horizontal landing (VTHL) method as used for the Space Shuttle. Within this study, launchers were designed using different propellant combinations, staging velocities and engine cycles. The designed launchers are evaluated in this paper regarding performance, technical difficulties, operational aspects, size, mass and complexity.

CEAS Space JournalVol. 17(1)
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
0.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.