Fracture Toughness of Short Fibre-Reinforced Composites—In Vitro Study

The development of dental materials needs to be supported with sound evidence. This in vitro study aimed to measure the fracture toughness of a short fibre-reinforced composite (sFRC), at differing thicknesses. In this study, 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm depths of sFRC were prepared. Using ISO4049, each preparation was tested to failure. A total of 60 samples were tested: 10 samples for each combination of sFRC and depth. Fractured samples were viewed, and outcomes were analysed. EXF showed greater toughness than EXP, with a mean of 2.49 (95%CI: 2.25, 2.73) MPa.m<sup>1/2</sup> compared to a mean of 2.13 (95%CI: 1.95, 2.31) MPa.m<sup>1/2</sup>, (F(1,54) = 21.28; <i>p</i> < 0.001). This difference was particularly pronounced at 2 mm depths where the mean (95%CI) values were 2.72 (2.49, 2.95) for EXF and 1.90 (1.78, 2.02) for EXP (Interaction F(2,54) = 7.93; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Both materials performed similarly at the depths of 3 mm and 4 mm. The results for both materials were within the accepted fracture toughness values of dentine of 1.79-3.08 MPa.m<sup>1/2</sup>. Analysis showed crack deflection and bridging fibre behaviour. The optimal thickness at the cavity base for EXF was 2 mm and for EXP 4 mm. Crack deflection and bridging behaviour indicated that restorations incorporating sFRCs are not prone to catastrophic failure and confirmed that sFRCs have similar fracture toughness to dentine. sFRCs could be a suitable biomimetic material to replace dentine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2024-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17215368
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fracture Toughness of Short Fibre-Reinforced Composites—In Vitro Study

Albert Leung, Maurice Faigenblum, Peter Fine, Robert Blizard et al.
7 citations
Materials
Dental materials and restorations
2.82
article

Fracture Toughness of Short Fibre-Reinforced Composites—In Vitro Study

Albert Leung, Maurice Faigenblum, Peter Fine, Robert Blizard, Noor Kamourieh
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The development of dental materials needs to be supported with sound evidence. This in vitro study aimed to measure the fracture toughness of a short fibre-reinforced composite (sFRC), at differing thicknesses. In this study, 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm depths of sFRC were prepared. Using ISO4049, each preparation was tested to failure. A total of 60 samples were tested: 10 samples for each combination of sFRC and depth. Fractured samples were viewed, and outcomes were analysed. EXF showed greater toughness than EXP, with a mean of 2.49 (95%CI: 2.25, 2.73) MPa.m<sup>1/2</sup> compared to a mean of 2.13 (95%CI: 1.95, 2.31) MPa.m<sup>1/2</sup>, (F(1,54) = 21.28; <i>p</i> < 0.001). This difference was particularly pronounced at 2 mm depths where the mean (95%CI) values were 2.72 (2.49, 2.95) for EXF and 1.90 (1.78, 2.02) for EXP (Interaction F(2,54) = 7.93; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Both materials performed similarly at the depths of 3 mm and 4 mm. The results for both materials were within the accepted fracture toughness values of dentine of 1.79-3.08 MPa.m<sup>1/2</sup>. Analysis showed crack deflection and bridging fibre behaviour. The optimal thickness at the cavity base for EXF was 2 mm and for EXP 4 mm. Crack deflection and bridging behaviour indicated that restorations incorporating sFRCs are not prone to catastrophic failure and confirmed that sFRCs have similar fracture toughness to dentine. sFRCs could be a suitable biomimetic material to replace dentine.

MaterialsVol. 17(21)
Eastman Dental Hospital (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dental materials and restorations
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.