Uses of the Trauma of Others: Insights from Two Ethnographic Studies of Human Service Workers

“Compassion fatigue” and “secondary traumatic stress” are clinical constructs developed to name the distress human services workers can experience when exposed to the trauma of the people they serve. We examine how human services workers mobilize the legitimacy and expansiveness of these constructs to respond to workplace demands. These clinically validated, yet persistently contested, constructs—in addition to being phenomena that happen to workers—are also resources that workers use to make ethicomoral claims regarding labor concerns. Synthesizing findings from two ethnographic studies of human services workers, we demonstrate that, although these constructs may name and legitimize distress, they also risk being used to minimize or obscure labor concerns when used to frame harm as a problem of individuals rather than as effects of organizational and political systems. We consider implications of these usages for human service organizations and their workers and for researchers and educators who use these constructs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Service Review
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732313
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uses of the Trauma of Others: Insights from Two Ethnographic Studies of Human Service Workers

Yvonne Smith, John Doering‐White
Social Service Review
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

Uses of the Trauma of Others: Insights from Two Ethnographic Studies of Human Service Workers

Yvonne Smith, John Doering‐White
article en

Abstract

“Compassion fatigue” and “secondary traumatic stress” are clinical constructs developed to name the distress human services workers can experience when exposed to the trauma of the people they serve. We examine how human services workers mobilize the legitimacy and expansiveness of these constructs to respond to workplace demands. These clinically validated, yet persistently contested, constructs—in addition to being phenomena that happen to workers—are also resources that workers use to make ethicomoral claims regarding labor concerns. Synthesizing findings from two ethnographic studies of human services workers, we demonstrate that, although these constructs may name and legitimize distress, they also risk being used to minimize or obscure labor concerns when used to frame harm as a problem of individuals rather than as effects of organizational and political systems. We consider implications of these usages for human service organizations and their workers and for researchers and educators who use these constructs.

Social Service ReviewVol. 98(4)
University of South Carolina (US), Syracuse University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.