Cost effectiveness and return on investment analysis for surgical care in a conflict-affected region of Sudan

The delivery of healthcare in conflict-affected regions places tremendous strains to health systems, and the economic value of surgical care in conflict settings remains poorly understood. Our aims were to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, societal economic benefits, and return on investment (ROI) for surgical care in a conflict-affected region in Sudan. We conducted a retrospective study of surgical care from January to December 2022 at the Mother of Mercy-Gidel Hospital (MMH) in the Nuba Mountains of Sudan, a semi-autonomous region characterized by chronic and cyclical conflict. We collected data on all patients undergoing surgical procedures (n = 3016), including age, condition, and procedure. We used the MMH budget and financial statements to measure direct medical and non-medical expenditures (costs) for care. We estimated the proportion of expenditures for surgical care through a survey of surgical vs non-surgical beds. The benefits of care were calculated as averted disability-adjusted life-years (DALYa) based on predicted outcomes for the most common 81% of procedures, and then extrapolated to the overall cohort. We calculated the average cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of care. The societal economic benefits of surgical care were modeled using a human capital approach, and we performed a ROI analysis. Uncertainty was estimated using sensitivity analysis. We found that the CER for all surgical care was $72.54/DALYa. This CER is far less than the gross domestic product per capita in the comparator economy of South Sudan ($585), qualifying it as very cost-effective by World Health Organization standards. The total societal economic impact of surgical care was $9,124,686, yielding a greater than 14:1 ROI ratio. Sensitivity analysis confirmed confidence in all output models. Surgical care in this conflict-affected region of Sudan is very cost-effective, provides substantial societal economic benefits, and a high return on investment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003712
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost effectiveness and return on investment analysis for surgical care in a conflict-affected region of Sudan

C. Phifer Nicholson, K. H. Young, Emily R. Smith, Anthony T. Saxton et al.
7 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Global Health and Surgery
3.80
article

Cost effectiveness and return on investment analysis for surgical care in a conflict-affected region of Sudan

C. Phifer Nicholson, K. H. Young, Emily R. Smith, Anthony T. Saxton, Henry E. Rice, Mark G. Shrime, Jon Fielder, Thomas Catena
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The delivery of healthcare in conflict-affected regions places tremendous strains to health systems, and the economic value of surgical care in conflict settings remains poorly understood. Our aims were to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, societal economic benefits, and return on investment (ROI) for surgical care in a conflict-affected region in Sudan. We conducted a retrospective study of surgical care from January to December 2022 at the Mother of Mercy-Gidel Hospital (MMH) in the Nuba Mountains of Sudan, a semi-autonomous region characterized by chronic and cyclical conflict. We collected data on all patients undergoing surgical procedures (n = 3016), including age, condition, and procedure. We used the MMH budget and financial statements to measure direct medical and non-medical expenditures (costs) for care. We estimated the proportion of expenditures for surgical care through a survey of surgical vs non-surgical beds. The benefits of care were calculated as averted disability-adjusted life-years (DALYa) based on predicted outcomes for the most common 81% of procedures, and then extrapolated to the overall cohort. We calculated the average cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of care. The societal economic benefits of surgical care were modeled using a human capital approach, and we performed a ROI analysis. Uncertainty was estimated using sensitivity analysis. We found that the CER for all surgical care was $72.54/DALYa. This CER is far less than the gross domestic product per capita in the comparator economy of South Sudan ($585), qualifying it as very cost-effective by World Health Organization standards. The total societal economic impact of surgical care was $9,124,686, yielding a greater than 14:1 ROI ratio. Sensitivity analysis confirmed confidence in all output models. Surgical care in this conflict-affected region of Sudan is very cost-effective, provides substantial societal economic benefits, and a high return on investment.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 4(11)
Mission Health (US), Harvard University (US), Duke University (US), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Harvard Global Health Institute (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Health and Surgery
3.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.