Comparative Analysis of Channel Capacities in 6G Networks: Massive MIMO, Millimeter-wave and Terahertz Channels

In the exploration of channel capacities within 6G networks, a comparative analysis has been conducted on Massive MIMO, Millimeter-wave, and Terahertz communication channels. The study reveals that, in terms of capacity, both Millimeter-wave and Terahertz channels demonstrate slightly elevated capacities in comparison to Massive MIMO. However, it is noteworthy that all three channels exhibit promising capabilities for facilitating high- capacity wireless communication in advanced. The research reveals that Millimeter-wave and Terahertz frequency bands exhibit slightly greater average channel capacities compared to Massive MIMO, showcasing potential for high-capacity wireless communication. Terahertz technology operates at frequencies exceeding 300 GHz, providing exceptionally wide bandwidths and rapid data transmission speeds, making it well-suited for applications demanding substantial throughput. On the other hand, Millimeter-wave technology, operating within the 30 GHz to 300 GHz range, facilitates accelerated data transfer rates due to its broader bandwidth availability, making it particularly suitable for high-capacity uses such as advanced 5G services. While Massive MIMO systems, which employ multiple antennas at the base station, enhance spectral efficiency and capacity, they achieve only a moderate data rate per unit bandwidth.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iceect61758.2024.10739297
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Channel Capacities in 6G Networks: Massive MIMO, Millimeter-wave and Terahertz Channels

Ashutosh Tripathi, S. Merlin Gilbert Raj, Vikas Rajput, Shilpa Choudhary
2 citations
Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
0.42
article

Comparative Analysis of Channel Capacities in 6G Networks: Massive MIMO, Millimeter-wave and Terahertz Channels

Ashutosh Tripathi, S. Merlin Gilbert Raj, Vikas Rajput, Shilpa Choudhary
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the exploration of channel capacities within 6G networks, a comparative analysis has been conducted on Massive MIMO, Millimeter-wave, and Terahertz communication channels. The study reveals that, in terms of capacity, both Millimeter-wave and Terahertz channels demonstrate slightly elevated capacities in comparison to Massive MIMO. However, it is noteworthy that all three channels exhibit promising capabilities for facilitating high- capacity wireless communication in advanced. The research reveals that Millimeter-wave and Terahertz frequency bands exhibit slightly greater average channel capacities compared to Massive MIMO, showcasing potential for high-capacity wireless communication. Terahertz technology operates at frequencies exceeding 300 GHz, providing exceptionally wide bandwidths and rapid data transmission speeds, making it well-suited for applications demanding substantial throughput. On the other hand, Millimeter-wave technology, operating within the 30 GHz to 300 GHz range, facilitates accelerated data transfer rates due to its broader bandwidth availability, making it particularly suitable for high-capacity uses such as advanced 5G services. While Massive MIMO systems, which employ multiple antennas at the base station, enhance spectral efficiency and capacity, they achieve only a moderate data rate per unit bandwidth.

Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.