Connecting Cross-Modal Representations for Compact and Robust Multimodal Sentiment Analysis With Sentiment Word Substitution Error

Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) seeks to fuse textual, acoustic, and visual information to predict a speaker’s sentiment states effectively. However, in real-world scenarios, the text modality received by MSA systems is often obtained through automatic speech recognition (ASR) models. Unfortunately, ASR may erroneously recognize sentiment words as phonetically similar neutral alternatives, leading to sentiment degradation in text and impacting MSA accuracy. Recent attempts aim to first identify the sentiment word substitution (SWS) error in ASR results and then refine the corrupted word embeddings using multimodal information for final multimodal fusion. However, such a method includes a burdensome and ambiguous detection operation and ignores the inherent correlations and heterogeneity among different modalities. To address these issues, we propose a more compact system, termed <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ARF-MSA</b> consisting of three key components to achieving robust MSA with SWS errors: 1) <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Alignment</b>: we establish connections between the “text-acoustic’ and “text-visual” representations to effectively map the “text-acoustic-visual” data into a unified sentiment space by leveraging their multimodal correlation knowledge; 2) <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Refinement</b>: we perform fine-grained comparisons between the text modality and the other two modalities in the unified sentiment space, enabling refinement of the sentiment expression within the text modality more concisely; 3) <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Fusion</b>: Finally, we hierarchically fuse the dominant and non-dominant representation from three heterogeneity modalities to obtain the multimodal feature for MSA. We conduct extensive experiments on the real-world datasets and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of our model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/taffc.2024.3490694
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connecting Cross-Modal Representations for Compact and Robust Multimodal Sentiment Analysis With Sentiment Word Substitution Error

Haolin Zuo, Haizhou Li, Rui Liu, Qiyuan Sun
6 citations
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
2.08
article

Connecting Cross-Modal Representations for Compact and Robust Multimodal Sentiment Analysis With Sentiment Word Substitution Error

Haolin Zuo, Haizhou Li, Rui Liu, Qiyuan Sun
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA) seeks to fuse textual, acoustic, and visual information to predict a speaker’s sentiment states effectively. However, in real-world scenarios, the text modality received by MSA systems is often obtained through automatic speech recognition (ASR) models. Unfortunately, ASR may erroneously recognize sentiment words as phonetically similar neutral alternatives, leading to sentiment degradation in text and impacting MSA accuracy. Recent attempts aim to first identify the sentiment word substitution (SWS) error in ASR results and then refine the corrupted word embeddings using multimodal information for final multimodal fusion. However, such a method includes a burdensome and ambiguous detection operation and ignores the inherent correlations and heterogeneity among different modalities. To address these issues, we propose a more compact system, termed <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ARF-MSA</b> consisting of three key components to achieving robust MSA with SWS errors: 1) <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Alignment</b>: we establish connections between the “text-acoustic’ and “text-visual” representations to effectively map the “text-acoustic-visual” data into a unified sentiment space by leveraging their multimodal correlation knowledge; 2) <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Refinement</b>: we perform fine-grained comparisons between the text modality and the other two modalities in the unified sentiment space, enabling refinement of the sentiment expression within the text modality more concisely; 3) <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Fusion</b>: Finally, we hierarchically fuse the dominant and non-dominant representation from three heterogeneity modalities to obtain the multimodal feature for MSA. We conduct extensive experiments on the real-world datasets and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of our model.

IEEE Transactions on Affective ComputingVol. 16(3)
Inner Mongolia University (CN), Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
2.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.