Evaluation of national and international gridded meteorological products for rainfall-runoff modelling in Northern Italy

Northern Italy. Gridded meteorological products provide spatially-distributed meteorological forcings, facilitating hydrological modeling in large-scale experiments. However, their accuracy, in particular as far as precipitation is concerned, varies considerably in space and time, and rigorous validation of these products is essential before their application. This study conducts a large-scale evaluation of five meteorological datasets in Northern Italy through i) a direct comparison of precipitation and temperature estimates and ii) an indirect validation, assessing their ability to reproduce streamflow when used to force the CemaNeige-GR6J hydrological model. The tested datasets include two gauged-based products, namely SCIA (the reference gridded dataset from the Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research) and E-OBS, two products based on reanalyses (the global ERA5-Land and the national MERIDA) and a gauged-corrected global satellite precipitation product (CHIRPS). Gauge-based datasets provide the best streamflow simulations when the underlying station density is high: SCIA, based on a uniform and dense gauge network across the entire study area, confirms to be the best choice as the climatic reference dataset, while the use of E-OBS is not recommended in Piedmont due to the low number of stations. In areas with low station density, reanalyses may yield to more accurate results: among reanalysis-based products, the Italian MERIDA dataset outperforms ERA5-Land. Finally, CHIRPS results to be the least accurate precipitation dataset. • Evaluation of gridded meteorological products for hydrological impact studies. • New insights for selecting precipitation and temperature products in Northern Italy. • Gauge-based products are the most accurate when underlying station density is high. • Among reanalysis-based products, the Italian MERIDA dataset outperforms ERA5-Land. • CHIRPS precipitation provides the less accurate rainfall-runoff simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.102031
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of national and international gridded meteorological products for rainfall-runoff modelling in Northern Italy

Elena Toth, Gökhan Sarigil, Mattia Neri
3 citations
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.60
article

Evaluation of national and international gridded meteorological products for rainfall-runoff modelling in Northern Italy

Elena Toth, Gökhan Sarigil, Mattia Neri
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Northern Italy. Gridded meteorological products provide spatially-distributed meteorological forcings, facilitating hydrological modeling in large-scale experiments. However, their accuracy, in particular as far as precipitation is concerned, varies considerably in space and time, and rigorous validation of these products is essential before their application. This study conducts a large-scale evaluation of five meteorological datasets in Northern Italy through i) a direct comparison of precipitation and temperature estimates and ii) an indirect validation, assessing their ability to reproduce streamflow when used to force the CemaNeige-GR6J hydrological model. The tested datasets include two gauged-based products, namely SCIA (the reference gridded dataset from the Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research) and E-OBS, two products based on reanalyses (the global ERA5-Land and the national MERIDA) and a gauged-corrected global satellite precipitation product (CHIRPS). Gauge-based datasets provide the best streamflow simulations when the underlying station density is high: SCIA, based on a uniform and dense gauge network across the entire study area, confirms to be the best choice as the climatic reference dataset, while the use of E-OBS is not recommended in Piedmont due to the low number of stations. In areas with low station density, reanalyses may yield to more accurate results: among reanalysis-based products, the Italian MERIDA dataset outperforms ERA5-Land. Finally, CHIRPS results to be the least accurate precipitation dataset. • Evaluation of gridded meteorological products for hydrological impact studies. • New insights for selecting precipitation and temperature products in Northern Italy. • Gauge-based products are the most accurate when underlying station density is high. • Among reanalysis-based products, the Italian MERIDA dataset outperforms ERA5-Land. • CHIRPS precipitation provides the less accurate rainfall-runoff simulations.

Journal of Hydrology Regional StudiesVol. 56
University of Bologna (IT)
European Commission
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.