The VST ATLAS Quasar Survey – II. Halo mass profiles of galaxies, LRGs and galaxy clusters via quasar and CMB lensing

ABSTRACT We cross-correlate a low-contamination subset of the VST ATLAS $g\lt 22.5$ quasar catalogue with $g\lt 21.5$ galaxy clusters, $r\lt 21$ galaxies and $r\lt 19.5$ luminous red galaxies (LRGs) to probe their halo mass profiles via quasar magnification bias caused by weak lensing. In the case of galaxy clusters, we find that at small scales their mass profiles are well fitted by Navarro, Frenk, and White models with masses within the expected range. For the galaxies, we find consistency with previous Sloan Digital Sky Survey-based results for the galaxy–quasar cross-correlation and the galaxy auto-correlation functions. Disagreement as to whether the cross-correlation results are in tension with $\Lambda$cold dark matter appears due to different assumptions as to whether galaxies trace mass. We conclude that halo occupation distribution (HOD) models fit the galaxy–quasar lensing results better than models where galaxies trace the mass. We further test the cluster and galaxy HOD models in the 2-halo range using the Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing map, finding that the cross-correlation with both the poorest clusters and the galaxies may be marginally overpredicted by the above HOD models. Finally, we measure the magnification bias of LRGs using both quasar and CMB lensing and find that the observed quasar lensing amplitude may be ${\approx} 2\times$ too high and, on larger scales, the CMB lensing amplitude may be too low to be explained by a standard LRG HOD model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2466
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The VST ATLAS Quasar Survey – II. Halo mass profiles of galaxies, LRGs and galaxy clusters via quasar and CMB lensing

Alice M Eltvedt, L. Felipe Barrientos, N. Metcalfe, Behzad Ansarinejad et al.
1 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
0.51
article

The VST ATLAS Quasar Survey – II. Halo mass profiles of galaxies, LRGs and galaxy clusters via quasar and CMB lensing

Alice M Eltvedt, L. Felipe Barrientos, N. Metcalfe, Behzad Ansarinejad, T. Shanks, D. N. A. Murphy, D. M. Alexander
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We cross-correlate a low-contamination subset of the VST ATLAS $g\lt 22.5$ quasar catalogue with $g\lt 21.5$ galaxy clusters, $r\lt 21$ galaxies and $r\lt 19.5$ luminous red galaxies (LRGs) to probe their halo mass profiles via quasar magnification bias caused by weak lensing. In the case of galaxy clusters, we find that at small scales their mass profiles are well fitted by Navarro, Frenk, and White models with masses within the expected range. For the galaxies, we find consistency with previous Sloan Digital Sky Survey-based results for the galaxy–quasar cross-correlation and the galaxy auto-correlation functions. Disagreement as to whether the cross-correlation results are in tension with $\Lambda$cold dark matter appears due to different assumptions as to whether galaxies trace mass. We conclude that halo occupation distribution (HOD) models fit the galaxy–quasar lensing results better than models where galaxies trace the mass. We further test the cluster and galaxy HOD models in the 2-halo range using the Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing map, finding that the cross-correlation with both the poorest clusters and the galaxies may be marginally overpredicted by the above HOD models. Finally, we measure the magnification bias of LRGs using both quasar and CMB lensing and find that the observed quasar lensing amplitude may be ${\approx} 2\times$ too high and, on larger scales, the CMB lensing amplitude may be too low to be explained by a standard LRG HOD model.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 535(3)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), The University of Melbourne (AU), Durham University (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Institute of Astronomy (RU)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, University of California, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
0.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.