Traditions and Transitions: Investigation of Apostolic Decision-Making Methods in the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15:1-21

This article explores the decision-making methods adopted by early church leaders during the Council of Jerusalem, as recorded in Acts 15. Through careful analysis of the text, the researcher examines how Jewish tradition and the new challenges presented by the growth of the Gentile church influenced the dynamics of apostolic decision-making. This study uses a hermeneutic approach to understand the theological, social, and political arguments considered during the decision-making process and how they reflect the principles of an inclusive and democratic early community. This research shows that this decision-making method demonstrates a spirit of consensus, respect for tradition, and sensitivity to diverse cultural contexts. The process of open dialogue, participation of the Holy Spirit, and respect for the Scriptures' teachings emphasize the Church's relevance and flexibility in the face of change and controversy. Our conclusion confirms that the Council of Jerusalem is an essential model for decision-making practices in the contemporary Church, offering valuable insights into maintaining doctrinal unity in diverse practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Jaffray
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25278/jj.v22i2.923
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traditions and Transitions: Investigation of Apostolic Decision-Making Methods in the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15:1-21

Jani Jani, Donovan Dugan
Jurnal Jaffray
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Traditions and Transitions: Investigation of Apostolic Decision-Making Methods in the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15:1-21

Jani Jani, Donovan Dugan
article en

Abstract

This article explores the decision-making methods adopted by early church leaders during the Council of Jerusalem, as recorded in Acts 15. Through careful analysis of the text, the researcher examines how Jewish tradition and the new challenges presented by the growth of the Gentile church influenced the dynamics of apostolic decision-making. This study uses a hermeneutic approach to understand the theological, social, and political arguments considered during the decision-making process and how they reflect the principles of an inclusive and democratic early community. This research shows that this decision-making method demonstrates a spirit of consensus, respect for tradition, and sensitivity to diverse cultural contexts. The process of open dialogue, participation of the Holy Spirit, and respect for the Scriptures' teachings emphasize the Church's relevance and flexibility in the face of change and controversy. Our conclusion confirms that the Council of Jerusalem is an essential model for decision-making practices in the contemporary Church, offering valuable insights into maintaining doctrinal unity in diverse practices.

Jurnal JaffrayVol. 22(2)
Institut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya (ID), Fuller Theological Seminary (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.