Effect of manual topping on insect pest incidence and cotton yield

Bollworms and sap-sucking insect pests are a significant constraint to cotton production in Africa. Manual topping of cotton plants, which consists of cutting off the top of the plant, i.e. the terminal bud of the main stem, is a promising alternative to chemical control by removing resources for certain pests or inducing plant defences. In this study, we evaluated the level of protection by topping against bollworms and sap-sucking insect pests and the effect of topping on seed cotton yield. Six experiments combining insecticide protection (sprayed vs. unsprayed plots) and topping (topped vs. non-topped plots) were conducted in Mali and Senegal. Topping by itself conferred weak protection against bollworms with an 11% reduction in the proportion of damaged shed squares and bolls, compared to insecticide protection (-55%). Topping had a low to moderate effectiveness in reducing the incidence of sap-sucking pests (-20 to -48%), but equivalent to insecticide treatments. Although topping significantly reduced the proportion of damaged bolls (-31%) at harvest in the absence of insecticide protection, this did not substantially affect seed cotton yield (+4%), unlike insecticide protection (+52%). However, this technique could be advantageously combined with threshold-based interventions integrating biopesticides to reduce the environmental impact of crop protection in cotton. • Cotton topping conferred weak protection against bollworms with an 11% reduction in the proportion of damaged shed squares and bolls, compared to insecticide protection (-55%). • Topping had a low to moderate effectiveness in reducing the incidence of sap-sucking pests (-20 to -48%), but equivalent to insecticide treatments. • Topping did not substantially affect seed cotton yield (+7%), unlike insecticide protection (+52%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Protection
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.107016
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of manual topping on insect pest incidence and cotton yield

Djibril Badiane, Thierry Brévault, Bernard Sodio, Amadou Traoré et al.
2 citations
Crop Protection
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
1.08
article

Effect of manual topping on insect pest incidence and cotton yield

Djibril Badiane, Thierry Brévault, Bernard Sodio, Amadou Traoré, Moribo Coulibaly, Idrissa Téréta, Daouda S. Maïga
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Bollworms and sap-sucking insect pests are a significant constraint to cotton production in Africa. Manual topping of cotton plants, which consists of cutting off the top of the plant, i.e. the terminal bud of the main stem, is a promising alternative to chemical control by removing resources for certain pests or inducing plant defences. In this study, we evaluated the level of protection by topping against bollworms and sap-sucking insect pests and the effect of topping on seed cotton yield. Six experiments combining insecticide protection (sprayed vs. unsprayed plots) and topping (topped vs. non-topped plots) were conducted in Mali and Senegal. Topping by itself conferred weak protection against bollworms with an 11% reduction in the proportion of damaged shed squares and bolls, compared to insecticide protection (-55%). Topping had a low to moderate effectiveness in reducing the incidence of sap-sucking pests (-20 to -48%), but equivalent to insecticide treatments. Although topping significantly reduced the proportion of damaged bolls (-31%) at harvest in the absence of insecticide protection, this did not substantially affect seed cotton yield (+4%), unlike insecticide protection (+52%). However, this technique could be advantageously combined with threshold-based interventions integrating biopesticides to reduce the environmental impact of crop protection in cotton. • Cotton topping conferred weak protection against bollworms with an 11% reduction in the proportion of damaged shed squares and bolls, compared to insecticide protection (-55%). • Topping had a low to moderate effectiveness in reducing the incidence of sap-sucking pests (-20 to -48%), but equivalent to insecticide treatments. • Topping did not substantially affect seed cotton yield (+7%), unlike insecticide protection (+52%).

Crop ProtectionVol. 188
University of Bamako (ML), Agroécologie (FR), Institut d'Économie Rurale (ML), Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako (ML), Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles (SN), Agro-écologie et intensification durable des cultures annuelles
Agence Française de Développement
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.