Do You See What I See? Emotional Reaction to Visual Content in the Online Debate About Climate Change

This paper explores the visual echo chamber effect in online climate change communication. We analyze communication by progressive actors and counteractors involved in the public debate about climate change on Facebook, to address the possibility that visual content can bridge ideologically diverse communities. Specifically, we investigate whether visual content depicting protest serves this purpose. The findings reveal a small amount of shared visual content. Interestingly, the emotional reactions to this content for the most part diverge significantly, suggesting that pre-existing attitudes, such as climate ideological position, influence interpretation. Contrary to our expectations, however, we do not observe visual content representing protest activity bridging the two groups. This work posits the possibility of a two-fold (de)polarization around visual content that both connects and divides, which contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the social dynamics that create and sustain the echo chamber effect observed in online climate change debates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Communication
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2024.2420787
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do You See What I See? Emotional Reaction to Visual Content in the Online Debate About Climate Change

Matteo Magnani, Alexandra Segerberg, Luca Rossi, Luigi Arminio
4 citations
Environmental Communication
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.53
article

Do You See What I See? Emotional Reaction to Visual Content in the Online Debate About Climate Change

Matteo Magnani, Alexandra Segerberg, Luca Rossi, Luigi Arminio
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This paper explores the visual echo chamber effect in online climate change communication. We analyze communication by progressive actors and counteractors involved in the public debate about climate change on Facebook, to address the possibility that visual content can bridge ideologically diverse communities. Specifically, we investigate whether visual content depicting protest serves this purpose. The findings reveal a small amount of shared visual content. Interestingly, the emotional reactions to this content for the most part diverge significantly, suggesting that pre-existing attitudes, such as climate ideological position, influence interpretation. Contrary to our expectations, however, we do not observe visual content representing protest activity bridging the two groups. This work posits the possibility of a two-fold (de)polarization around visual content that both connects and divides, which contributes to a more nuanced understanding of the social dynamics that create and sustain the echo chamber effect observed in online climate change debates.

Environmental CommunicationVol. 19(3)
Uppsala University (SE), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
European Commission, Vetenskapsrådet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.