An Organ-Specific Approach to the Management of Gestational Hypertension: Evidence versus Tradition

The management of hypertensive disease in pregnancy is currently guided by practice recommendations based largely on observational data from a half century ago and has changed only superficially since that time. These recommendations are both narrowly prescriptive (women without traditional features of severe disease should all be delivered at exactly 37<sup>0/7</sup> weeks) and at the same time frustratingly ambiguous (the presence of epigastric pain unresponsive to repeat analgesics precludes expectant management at any gestational age, regardless of laboratory studies). Guidelines that ignore recent data from the obstetric, pediatric, and internal medicine literature too often lead practitioners to be more aggressive than necessary in the delivery of very premature pregnancies, and, conversely, more complacent than patient safety would support in prolonging pregnancy with advanced fetal maturity. We present here an alternative, organ-specific-based approach to the management of gestational hypertension that allows and encourages practitioners to formulate a management plan based on a thoughtful and, when possible, evidence-based synthesis of the continuous variables of blood pressure, degree of organ dysfunction and response to treatment, gestational age, and patient balancing of maternal and fetal/neonatal risks. Such clinical care is more complex and nuanced than simply basing life-altering critical management decisions, including timing of delivery, on whether the patient does, or does not have any one of the conditions described by box 4 of the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice guidelines. Nonetheless, we believe this approach will not only improve care but will also open the door to useful investigations into prevention and management of the various entities traditionally considered as the same disease process. KEY POINTS: · Traditional approaches to preeclampsia are not evidence based.. · The use of such approaches has resulted in stagnant maternal morbidity and mortality ratios.. · The consideration of disease severity as binary is particularly counterproductive.. · An organ-based approach will facilitate evidence-based individualization of care..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2459-8748
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Organ-Specific Approach to the Management of Gestational Hypertension: Evidence versus Tradition

Mary Catherine Tolcher, Nathan C. Sundgren, Baha M. Sibai, Robert M. Silver et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Perinatology
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
0.58
article

An Organ-Specific Approach to the Management of Gestational Hypertension: Evidence versus Tradition

Mary Catherine Tolcher, Nathan C. Sundgren, Baha M. Sibai, Robert M. Silver, Avni Kapadia, Sai Kaumudi Saridey, George R. Saade, Dwight J. Rouse, Steven L. Clark, Michael A. Belfort
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The management of hypertensive disease in pregnancy is currently guided by practice recommendations based largely on observational data from a half century ago and has changed only superficially since that time. These recommendations are both narrowly prescriptive (women without traditional features of severe disease should all be delivered at exactly 37<sup>0/7</sup> weeks) and at the same time frustratingly ambiguous (the presence of epigastric pain unresponsive to repeat analgesics precludes expectant management at any gestational age, regardless of laboratory studies). Guidelines that ignore recent data from the obstetric, pediatric, and internal medicine literature too often lead practitioners to be more aggressive than necessary in the delivery of very premature pregnancies, and, conversely, more complacent than patient safety would support in prolonging pregnancy with advanced fetal maturity. We present here an alternative, organ-specific-based approach to the management of gestational hypertension that allows and encourages practitioners to formulate a management plan based on a thoughtful and, when possible, evidence-based synthesis of the continuous variables of blood pressure, degree of organ dysfunction and response to treatment, gestational age, and patient balancing of maternal and fetal/neonatal risks. Such clinical care is more complex and nuanced than simply basing life-altering critical management decisions, including timing of delivery, on whether the patient does, or does not have any one of the conditions described by box 4 of the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice guidelines. Nonetheless, we believe this approach will not only improve care but will also open the door to useful investigations into prevention and management of the various entities traditionally considered as the same disease process. KEY POINTS: · Traditional approaches to preeclampsia are not evidence based.. · The use of such approaches has resulted in stagnant maternal morbidity and mortality ratios.. · The consideration of disease severity as binary is particularly counterproductive.. · An organ-based approach will facilitate evidence-based individualization of care..

American Journal of PerinatologyVol. 42(04)
Eastern Virginia Medical School (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Utah (US), Brown University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Texas Children's Hospital (US), University of Houston (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
0.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.