Effects of Neoadjuvant Radiation and Recipient Vessel Characteristics on Microvascular Complication Rates in Reconstruction of Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Defects

The treatment approach for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the lower extremity has shifted toward the use of neoadjuvant radiation combined with limb-sparing surgery (LSS). The resulting defects often require reconstruction with free tissue transfer for adequate outcomes. Data have demonstrated a potentially increased risk of microvascular complications for free flaps performed using irradiated recipient vessels. Similarly, certain anatomic areas of the lower extremity have a high proportion of unnamed perforators that are available as recipient vessels, increasing the technical difficulty. We aimed to determine if the characteristics of recipient vessels that were used for the reconstruction of STS defects influenced rates of microvascular complications in our patients.A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent reconstruction of lower extremity STS defects with free tissue transfer from 2009 to 2020 was conducted. Data regarding recipient vessel type (axial vessel vs. unnamed perforator), radiation status of the recipient vessels (irradiated vs. non-irradiated), and microvascular complications were compared across groups.A total of 204 free flaps were included. The overall microvascular complication rate was 13.7% (28 cases). Most microvascular complications were detected postoperatively (82.1%) rather than intraoperatively, with the majority involving venous congestion/thrombosis (20 cases, 71.4%). While there was a trend toward increased microvascular complications with the use of irradiated recipient vessels (27 cases, 96.4%), this did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.98, <i>p</i> = 0.52). The use of perforating branches as recipient vessels did not confer an increased risk of microvascular complications (OR = 0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.75).The reconstruction of irradiated lower-extremity STS defects represents a particularly challenging issue. This analysis demonstrates that free tissue transfer can be safely performed using irradiated vessels without a significantly increased risk of microvascular complications. Furthermore, unnamed perforating branches can be successfully used for reconstruction in anatomically challenging areas of the lower extremity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2460-4649
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Neoadjuvant Radiation and Recipient Vessel Characteristics on Microvascular Complication Rates in Reconstruction of Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Defects

Elisa Emanuelli, Eldon Mah, J. Donald Easton, Rebecca Farmer et al.
1 citations
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
0.57
article

Effects of Neoadjuvant Radiation and Recipient Vessel Characteristics on Microvascular Complication Rates in Reconstruction of Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Defects

Elisa Emanuelli, Eldon Mah, J. Donald Easton, Rebecca Farmer, Ruston Sanchez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The treatment approach for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the lower extremity has shifted toward the use of neoadjuvant radiation combined with limb-sparing surgery (LSS). The resulting defects often require reconstruction with free tissue transfer for adequate outcomes. Data have demonstrated a potentially increased risk of microvascular complications for free flaps performed using irradiated recipient vessels. Similarly, certain anatomic areas of the lower extremity have a high proportion of unnamed perforators that are available as recipient vessels, increasing the technical difficulty. We aimed to determine if the characteristics of recipient vessels that were used for the reconstruction of STS defects influenced rates of microvascular complications in our patients.A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent reconstruction of lower extremity STS defects with free tissue transfer from 2009 to 2020 was conducted. Data regarding recipient vessel type (axial vessel vs. unnamed perforator), radiation status of the recipient vessels (irradiated vs. non-irradiated), and microvascular complications were compared across groups.A total of 204 free flaps were included. The overall microvascular complication rate was 13.7% (28 cases). Most microvascular complications were detected postoperatively (82.1%) rather than intraoperatively, with the majority involving venous congestion/thrombosis (20 cases, 71.4%). While there was a trend toward increased microvascular complications with the use of irradiated recipient vessels (27 cases, 96.4%), this did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.98, <i>p</i> = 0.52). The use of perforating branches as recipient vessels did not confer an increased risk of microvascular complications (OR = 0.87, <i>p</i> = 0.75).The reconstruction of irradiated lower-extremity STS defects represents a particularly challenging issue. This analysis demonstrates that free tissue transfer can be safely performed using irradiated vessels without a significantly increased risk of microvascular complications. Furthermore, unnamed perforating branches can be successfully used for reconstruction in anatomically challenging areas of the lower extremity.

Journal of Reconstructive MicrosurgeryVol. 41(07)
University of Kansas (US), St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), Texas Plastic Surgery (US), Louisiana Tech University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.