The Audience Chimera: On Platforms, Publics, and Power

Abstract A central question in recent scholarship on public music theory has been understanding its purpose and its relationship to traditional academic theory. However, one recurring weakness of these sorts of analyses is a tendency to view public music theory as a monolithic entity with a coherent identity and a singular purpose. In this paper, I argue that public music theory is better viewed as a decentralized collection of individual actors and communities whose actions must be understood in reference to the specific audiences they serve and the specific platforms through which they distribute their work, rather than to each other or to the academic world. I explore the power structures that shape the goals (and membership) of these various communities as they relate to their various publics, and I develop a framework to describe the flow of consumptive power in order to explain the observable differences between most forms of public music theory and the academic discipline they represent.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Music Theory Spectrum
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mts/mtae015
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Digital Games and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Audience Chimera: On Platforms, Publics, and Power

Cory B. Arnold
7 citations
Music Theory Spectrum
Digital Games and Media
7.92
article

The Audience Chimera: On Platforms, Publics, and Power

Cory B. Arnold
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract A central question in recent scholarship on public music theory has been understanding its purpose and its relationship to traditional academic theory. However, one recurring weakness of these sorts of analyses is a tendency to view public music theory as a monolithic entity with a coherent identity and a singular purpose. In this paper, I argue that public music theory is better viewed as a decentralized collection of individual actors and communities whose actions must be understood in reference to the specific audiences they serve and the specific platforms through which they distribute their work, rather than to each other or to the academic world. I explore the power structures that shape the goals (and membership) of these various communities as they relate to their various publics, and I develop a framework to describe the flow of consumptive power in order to explain the observable differences between most forms of public music theory and the academic discipline they represent.

Music Theory SpectrumVol. 47(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Games and Media
7.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.