Comparativa de diferentes modelos radiómicos para la clasificación de lesiones adrenales indeterminadas diagnosticadas de forma incidental en TC con contraste

Purpose: A comparison of different machine learning models to discriminate adrenal incidentalomas by CT studies was performed. Methods: Sixty-two different features were obtained from a sample of 61 incidentalomas using the free license software LIFEx and 19 radiomic studies were performed with different models and feature selection methods to obtain the most efficient determination of possible malignancy. For all of them, four cross-validation methods were evaluated. Adenoma contouring was performed in duplicate by different radiologists evaluating all models in both groups. Results: ROC AUC between 0.42 (0.09-0.81) and 0.92 (0.63-1.00), and accuracy of the models between 0.63 (0.43-0.79) and 0.94 (0.82-1.00). The best-performing model was the balanced logistic regression applied to the 14 features with an intraclass coefficient greater than 0.9, with which accuracy of 0.94 (0.74-1.00), ROC AUC of 0.917 (0.63-1.00), benign recall of 0.92 (0.65-1.00) and malignant recall of 1.00 (0.71-1.00) were obtained. Conclusions: The evaluation and validation of different models has allowed us to obtain an efficient radiomic model for the discrimination of adrenal incidentalomas

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Física Médica
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37004/sefm/2024.25.2.001
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparativa de diferentes modelos radiómicos para la clasificación de lesiones adrenales indeterminadas diagnosticadas de forma incidental en TC con contraste

D. Sevillano, R. Colmenares, Álvaro Suárez, Rafael Morís Pablos et al.
Revista de Física Médica
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Comparativa de diferentes modelos radiómicos para la clasificación de lesiones adrenales indeterminadas diagnosticadas de forma incidental en TC con contraste

D. Sevillano, R. Colmenares, Álvaro Suárez, Rafael Morís Pablos, Raquel García Latorre, Daniel Prieto, Miguel Cámara Gallego, E. Canales Lachén, Ernesto Santana, Javier Blázquez-Sánchez, Juan García, Miguel Ángel Gómez Bermejo, M. Navarro
article en

Abstract

Purpose: A comparison of different machine learning models to discriminate adrenal incidentalomas by CT studies was performed. Methods: Sixty-two different features were obtained from a sample of 61 incidentalomas using the free license software LIFEx and 19 radiomic studies were performed with different models and feature selection methods to obtain the most efficient determination of possible malignancy. For all of them, four cross-validation methods were evaluated. Adenoma contouring was performed in duplicate by different radiologists evaluating all models in both groups. Results: ROC AUC between 0.42 (0.09-0.81) and 0.92 (0.63-1.00), and accuracy of the models between 0.63 (0.43-0.79) and 0.94 (0.82-1.00). The best-performing model was the balanced logistic regression applied to the 14 features with an intraclass coefficient greater than 0.9, with which accuracy of 0.94 (0.74-1.00), ROC AUC of 0.917 (0.63-1.00), benign recall of 0.92 (0.65-1.00) and malignant recall of 1.00 (0.71-1.00) were obtained. Conclusions: The evaluation and validation of different models has allowed us to obtain an efficient radiomic model for the discrimination of adrenal incidentalomas

Revista de Física MédicaVol. 25(2)
Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria (ES), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.