Depth-driven responses of soil organic carbon fractions to orchard cover crops across China: A meta-analysis

Cover crops (CC) have been widely recognized and implemented as one of the most effective agronomic practices for enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in orchard ecosystems. However, considerable uncertainty remains regarding the effect of CC on specific SOC fractions, posing challenges for accurate prediction of carbon (C) dynamics, which requires further comprehensive study at regional and national scales. Based on 615 paired-comparisons from 47 studies across China, we investigated the effects of CC management on SOC fractions, including microbial biomass C (MBC), dissolved organic C (DOC), particulate organic C (POC), easily oxidizable organic C (EOC), light fraction organic C (LFOC), and heavy fraction organic C (HFOC). In addition, we quantified the effects of various environmental factors (e.g., climatic conditions), soil properties (e.g., soil characteristics and depth), and agronomic variables (e.g., experiment duration, tree age, cover type, source and species of grass, cover pattern, mowing practices, and residue management) on the changes in SOC fractions. Compared to conventional clean (bare ground) tillage, CC significantly increases MBC (35.4 %), DOC (23.7 %), POC (36.2 %), EOC (18.4 %), LFOC (99.9 %), and HFOC (5.4 %). Random forest modeling demonstrates that soil depth is the dominant driver of SOC fractions responses to CC, and the CC effects are weakened with soil depth. It is therefore crucial to consider the various drivers of SOC fractions between soil depths in order to accurately forecast soil C dynamics and its potential feedback on global warming. Overall, this study systematically assessed the effects of CC on SOC fractions changes in China and identified CC as a promising practice for increasing SOC in orchards. These findings further indicate that the response of SOC fractions to CC is predominantly influenced by specific climatic, edaphic, and agronomic variables. These results not only reveal the ecological benefits of CC, but also highlight the importance of developing site-specific CC practices for the sustainability of agroecosystems. • Cover crops (CC) significantly increase soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions. • The effect of CC on SOC fractions varies with climatic, edaphic, and agronomic factors. • Soil depth is the dominant driver of SOC fractions response to CC. • Stabilized organic carbon fraction (i.e., HFOC) show the least response to CC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil and Tillage Research
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2024.106348
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Depth-driven responses of soil organic carbon fractions to orchard cover crops across China: A meta-analysis

Xiaotong Liu, Weiting Ding, Francis Zvomuya, Hailong He et al.
16 citations
Soil and Tillage Research
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
5.34
article

Depth-driven responses of soil organic carbon fractions to orchard cover crops across China: A meta-analysis

Xiaotong Liu, Weiting Ding, Francis Zvomuya, Hailong He, Liangjie Sun, Yiwei Fang
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Cover crops (CC) have been widely recognized and implemented as one of the most effective agronomic practices for enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in orchard ecosystems. However, considerable uncertainty remains regarding the effect of CC on specific SOC fractions, posing challenges for accurate prediction of carbon (C) dynamics, which requires further comprehensive study at regional and national scales. Based on 615 paired-comparisons from 47 studies across China, we investigated the effects of CC management on SOC fractions, including microbial biomass C (MBC), dissolved organic C (DOC), particulate organic C (POC), easily oxidizable organic C (EOC), light fraction organic C (LFOC), and heavy fraction organic C (HFOC). In addition, we quantified the effects of various environmental factors (e.g., climatic conditions), soil properties (e.g., soil characteristics and depth), and agronomic variables (e.g., experiment duration, tree age, cover type, source and species of grass, cover pattern, mowing practices, and residue management) on the changes in SOC fractions. Compared to conventional clean (bare ground) tillage, CC significantly increases MBC (35.4 %), DOC (23.7 %), POC (36.2 %), EOC (18.4 %), LFOC (99.9 %), and HFOC (5.4 %). Random forest modeling demonstrates that soil depth is the dominant driver of SOC fractions responses to CC, and the CC effects are weakened with soil depth. It is therefore crucial to consider the various drivers of SOC fractions between soil depths in order to accurately forecast soil C dynamics and its potential feedback on global warming. Overall, this study systematically assessed the effects of CC on SOC fractions changes in China and identified CC as a promising practice for increasing SOC in orchards. These findings further indicate that the response of SOC fractions to CC is predominantly influenced by specific climatic, edaphic, and agronomic variables. These results not only reveal the ecological benefits of CC, but also highlight the importance of developing site-specific CC practices for the sustainability of agroecosystems. • Cover crops (CC) significantly increase soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions. • The effect of CC on SOC fractions varies with climatic, edaphic, and agronomic factors. • Soil depth is the dominant driver of SOC fractions response to CC. • Stabilized organic carbon fraction (i.e., HFOC) show the least response to CC.

Soil and Tillage ResearchVol. 246
International Bamboo and Rattan Organization (CN), Ministry of Agriculture (BW), Institute of Soil and Water Conservation (CN), State Forestry and Grassland Administration (CN), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), University of Manitoba (CA), Northwest A&F University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
5.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.