Instructed Response Item Attention Checks in Mixed-mode Questionnaires: Evidence from a Probability-based Mail and Online Panel

Mostly in web surveys, attention checks have been proposed to identify inattentive respondents in self-administered surveys as previous research has argued that low-quality answers may introduce severe biases in data analyses. The increasing popularity of mixing survey modes for conducting probability-based surveys amplifies the need for systematic research on the implementation of attention checks in these survey designs. Our study investigates whether an instructed response item (IRI) can be an adequate predictor of response quality in a self-administered mixed-mode panel survey with a probability-based German general population sample. By doing so, we compare the results of the attention check with those of other response quality indicators. However, while the results for the online respondents were somewhat promising, the mail respondents result suggests that this response quality indicator seems unreliable, so that we cannot recommend using IRIs in general population mixed-mode surveys, which include a mail option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Methods
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x241274103
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Instructed Response Item Attention Checks in Mixed-mode Questionnaires: Evidence from a Probability-based Mail and Online Panel

Joss Roßmann, David Bretschi, Jessica Daikeler, Henning Silber et al.
2 citations
Field Methods
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
2.26
article

Instructed Response Item Attention Checks in Mixed-mode Questionnaires: Evidence from a Probability-based Mail and Online Panel

Joss Roßmann, David Bretschi, Jessica Daikeler, Henning Silber, Tobias Gummer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Mostly in web surveys, attention checks have been proposed to identify inattentive respondents in self-administered surveys as previous research has argued that low-quality answers may introduce severe biases in data analyses. The increasing popularity of mixing survey modes for conducting probability-based surveys amplifies the need for systematic research on the implementation of attention checks in these survey designs. Our study investigates whether an instructed response item (IRI) can be an adequate predictor of response quality in a self-administered mixed-mode panel survey with a probability-based German general population sample. By doing so, we compare the results of the attention check with those of other response quality indicators. However, while the results for the online respondents were somewhat promising, the mail respondents result suggests that this response quality indicator seems unreliable, so that we cannot recommend using IRIs in general population mixed-mode surveys, which include a mail option.

Field MethodsVol. 37(3)
Bundeskriminalamt (DE), University of Mannheim (DE), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Instructed Response Item Attention Checks in Mixed-mode Questionnaires: Evidence from a Probability-based Mail and Online Panel — Joss Roßmann, David Bretschi, et al. · Field Methods (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS