Clinical Feasibility of 5.0 T MRI/MRCP in Characterizing Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Comparison with 3.0 T and MDCT

<b>Objectives:</b> To assess the feasibility of 5.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs), compared with 3.0 T MRI and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). <b>Methods:</b> Thirty-five patients with PCLs underwent 5.0 T MR alongside 3.0 T MR or MDCT. Two observers measured subjective and objective image quality scores. The consistency of two observers between 5.0 T and 3.0 T was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficients. The characteristics of PCLs and their specific diagnosis, as well as benignity/malignancy, were evaluated across MDCT, 3.0 T, and 5.0 T MRI. <b>Results:</b> The 5.0 T MR demonstrated significantly higher subjective image quality and SNR on T1WI compared to that in 3.0 T MR (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The 5.0 T MRI identified more cyst lesions than the 3.0 T MRI (40 and 32) and MDCT (82 and 56). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating benign from malignant lesions with 5.0 T MRI (75%, 100%, and 91.4%, respectively) surpassed those of 3.0 T MRI and MDCT. The accuracy of the specific diagnosis of PCLs at 5.0 T MRI (80%) was superior to 3.0 T MRI and MDCT. <b>Conclusions:</b> 5.0 T MRI exhibits certain superiority in delineating details of PCLs and in clinical diagnostic accuracy, outperforming MDCT and 3.0 T MRI while maintaining sufficient image quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212457
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Feasibility of 5.0 T MRI/MRCP in Characterizing Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Comparison with 3.0 T and MDCT

Ke Xue, Liang Zhu, Yuxin Yang, Ruichen Gao et al.
4 citations
Diagnostics
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
1.13
article

Clinical Feasibility of 5.0 T MRI/MRCP in Characterizing Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Comparison with 3.0 T and MDCT

Ke Xue, Liang Zhu, Yuxin Yang, Ruichen Gao, Bohui Yin, Qiang Xu, Feng Feng, Wenming Wu, Enhui Li, Huijia Zhao, Gan Sun
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> To assess the feasibility of 5.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs), compared with 3.0 T MRI and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). <b>Methods:</b> Thirty-five patients with PCLs underwent 5.0 T MR alongside 3.0 T MR or MDCT. Two observers measured subjective and objective image quality scores. The consistency of two observers between 5.0 T and 3.0 T was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficients. The characteristics of PCLs and their specific diagnosis, as well as benignity/malignancy, were evaluated across MDCT, 3.0 T, and 5.0 T MRI. <b>Results:</b> The 5.0 T MR demonstrated significantly higher subjective image quality and SNR on T1WI compared to that in 3.0 T MR (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The 5.0 T MRI identified more cyst lesions than the 3.0 T MRI (40 and 32) and MDCT (82 and 56). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for differentiating benign from malignant lesions with 5.0 T MRI (75%, 100%, and 91.4%, respectively) surpassed those of 3.0 T MRI and MDCT. The accuracy of the specific diagnosis of PCLs at 5.0 T MRI (80%) was superior to 3.0 T MRI and MDCT. <b>Conclusions:</b> 5.0 T MRI exhibits certain superiority in delineating details of PCLs and in clinical diagnostic accuracy, outperforming MDCT and 3.0 T MRI while maintaining sufficient image quality.

DiagnosticsVol. 14(21)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), United Imaging Healthcare (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.