Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Segmentation: A Multi-Dataset, Multi-Algorithm Study

Deep learning is revolutionizing various scientific fields, with medical applications at the forefront. One key focus is automating image segmentation, a process crucial in many clinical services. However, medical images are often ambiguous and challenging even for experts. To address this, reliable models need to quantify their uncertainty, allowing physicians to understand the model’s confidence in its segmentation. This paper explores how the performance and uncertainty of a model are influenced by the number of annotations per input sample. We examine the effects of both single and multiple manual annotations on various deep learning architectures. To tackle this question, we employ three widely recognized deep learning architectures and evaluate them across four publicly available datasets. Furthermore, we explore the effects of dropout rates on Monte Carlo models by examining uncertainty models with dropout rates of 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%. Subsequently, we evaluate the models using various measurement metrics. The findings reveal that the influence of multiple annotations varies significantly depending on the datasets. Additionally, we observe that the dropout rate has minimal or no impact on the model’s performance unless there is a substantial loss of training data, primarily evident in the 80% dropout rate scenario.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142110020
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Segmentation: A Multi-Dataset, Multi-Algorithm Study

Miłosz Rozynek, Iwona Kucybała, Niyaz Jalal, Wadim Wojciechowski et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
0.35
article

Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Segmentation: A Multi-Dataset, Multi-Algorithm Study

Miłosz Rozynek, Iwona Kucybała, Niyaz Jalal, Wadim Wojciechowski, Kamil Krupa, Patrycja S. Matusik, Zbisław Tabor, Jarosław D. Jarczewski, Małgorzata Śliwińska
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Deep learning is revolutionizing various scientific fields, with medical applications at the forefront. One key focus is automating image segmentation, a process crucial in many clinical services. However, medical images are often ambiguous and challenging even for experts. To address this, reliable models need to quantify their uncertainty, allowing physicians to understand the model’s confidence in its segmentation. This paper explores how the performance and uncertainty of a model are influenced by the number of annotations per input sample. We examine the effects of both single and multiple manual annotations on various deep learning architectures. To tackle this question, we employ three widely recognized deep learning architectures and evaluate them across four publicly available datasets. Furthermore, we explore the effects of dropout rates on Monte Carlo models by examining uncertainty models with dropout rates of 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%. Subsequently, we evaluate the models using various measurement metrics. The findings reveal that the influence of multiple annotations varies significantly depending on the datasets. Additionally, we observe that the dropout rate has minimal or no impact on the model’s performance unless there is a substantial loss of training data, primarily evident in the 80% dropout rate scenario.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(21)
Jagiellonian University (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Narodowe Centrum Nauki, Infrastruktura PL-Grid, Academic Computer Centre Cyfronet, AGH University of Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.