“Can’t Remember What I Forgot:” Investigating Organizational Forgetting Within a Project-Based Organization

This article is based on the study of an engineering organization that is experiencing major difficulties on its first new project in 10 years. It contributes to the literature on organizational forgetting in project-based organizations, examining how this phenomenon can be perceived and assessed. The analysis of the data provides a better understanding of the conditions under which a situation of accidental forgetting can be (mis)identified. The case reveals that, due to five sources of ambiguity linked to the identification process—latency, novelty, multiplicity, complexity, and credibility—the forgetting phenomenon may be underestimated or the subject of contradictory assessments within the organization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Project Management Journal
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241286045
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Can’t Remember What I Forgot:” Investigating Organizational Forgetting Within a Project-Based Organization

Cédric Dalmasso, Frédéric Garcias, Colette Depeyre
2 citations
Project Management Journal
Construction Project Management and Performance
0.98
article

“Can’t Remember What I Forgot:” Investigating Organizational Forgetting Within a Project-Based Organization

Cédric Dalmasso, Frédéric Garcias, Colette Depeyre
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article is based on the study of an engineering organization that is experiencing major difficulties on its first new project in 10 years. It contributes to the literature on organizational forgetting in project-based organizations, examining how this phenomenon can be perceived and assessed. The analysis of the data provides a better understanding of the conditions under which a situation of accidental forgetting can be (mis)identified. The case reveals that, due to five sources of ambiguity linked to the identification process—latency, novelty, multiplicity, complexity, and credibility—the forgetting phenomenon may be underestimated or the subject of contradictory assessments within the organization.

Project Management JournalVol. 56(6)
Université de Lille (FR), Université Paris Dauphine-PSL (FR), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Construction Project Management and Performance
0.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.