Identifying Factors that Increase False-Positive Rates on Embedded Performance Validity Testing in ADHD Evaluations

Findings suggest that practitioners should consider both the type of test from which an EVI is derived and the aggregate number of EVIs employed to minimize the FPRs in ADHD evaluations. Findings also indicate that more nuanced approaches to validity test selection and development are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae099
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Factors that Increase False-Positive Rates on Embedded Performance Validity Testing in ADHD Evaluations

Jason R. Soble, Devin M. Ulrich, Rachel Keszycki, Matthew S. Phillips et al.
2 citations
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
0.77
article

Identifying Factors that Increase False-Positive Rates on Embedded Performance Validity Testing in ADHD Evaluations

Jason R. Soble, Devin M. Ulrich, Rachel Keszycki, Matthew S. Phillips, Anthony Robinson, Brian M. Cerny, John‐Christopher A. Finley, Logan M. Tufty, Steven A. Abalos, Greg Shapiro, Mary Woloszyn
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Findings suggest that practitioners should consider both the type of test from which an EVI is derived and the aggregate number of EVIs employed to minimize the FPRs in ADHD evaluations. Findings also indicate that more nuanced approaches to validity test selection and development are needed.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(3)
Northwestern University (US), Illinois College (US), Illinois Institute of Technology (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), The Chicago School (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
0.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.