Children's consideration of effort and outcome in reward distribution tasks

Abstract In the current study, we asked whether children recognize initial inequalities in resources and the effect of these inequalities on subsequent outcomes. We presented 6‐ to 8‐year‐old children with a series of vignettes in which characters’ contribution and effort to a joint task were manipulated, along with the tool they had to complete the task, which affected their relative advantage. Each vignette contained a situation where two children had to help a third person dig pails of sand. In each scenario, the number of pails each child dug, as well as the type of shovel (making it easier or harder for them to dig), was manipulated. Children were asked how rewards should be distributed and who they believed worked harder. We found that children weighed outcome, or the number of pails of sand produced, more heavily than other factors, and only the oldest children showed evidence of considering initial inequalities and effort when making decisions about resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Development
Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12778
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children's consideration of effort and outcome in reward distribution tasks

Vanessa LoBue, Emily Kim
Social Development
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Children's consideration of effort and outcome in reward distribution tasks

Vanessa LoBue, Emily Kim
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the current study, we asked whether children recognize initial inequalities in resources and the effect of these inequalities on subsequent outcomes. We presented 6‐ to 8‐year‐old children with a series of vignettes in which characters’ contribution and effort to a joint task were manipulated, along with the tool they had to complete the task, which affected their relative advantage. Each vignette contained a situation where two children had to help a third person dig pails of sand. In each scenario, the number of pails each child dug, as well as the type of shovel (making it easier or harder for them to dig), was manipulated. Children were asked how rewards should be distributed and who they believed worked harder. We found that children weighed outcome, or the number of pails of sand produced, more heavily than other factors, and only the oldest children showed evidence of considering initial inequalities and effort when making decisions about resource allocation.

Social DevelopmentVol. 34(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
James S. McDonnell Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.