Modulation Interference from Speech-Modulated Noise in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users

Purpose: This study examined modulation interference in sentence recognition for bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users.Methods: Thirteen bimodal users and thirteen normal-hearing (NH) listeners (reference) participated in this study. The adaptive Korean Matrix sentence-in-noise test measured the speech reception thresholds (SRTs) required for 50% speech-in-noise intelligibility. As background noise, we presented two background noises: stationary speech-shaped noise (SSN) and single-talker speech-modulated masker (International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology noise, ICRA). The amount of masking release due to fluctuations in the speech-modulated noise, called speech masking release (SMR), was calculated from the difference between SRTs with SSN and SRTs with ICRA noise. The SRTs were measured twice for bimodal CI users: CI-only and bimodal listening.Results: The mean SMR for NH listeners was approximately 12 dB. The mean SMR for bimodal CI users was about -5 dB, with either CI alone or bimodal listening. This means that bimodal CI users experienced modulation interference rather than masking release from the temporal fluctuations. We observed positive bimodal benefits, yet the interference from fluctuating maskers was similar between the CI-only and bimodal listening. The low-frequency aided hearing thresholds in the non-implanted ear were unrelated to the amount of SMR for bimodal users.Conclusion: NH listeners could take advantage of temporal fluctuations in the speech-modulated noise. However, bimodal CI listeners hardly glimpsed target speech in the dips of the speech-modulated masker, regardless of listening mode. Bimodal listening did not significantly reduce modulation interference compared to CI-only listening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology and Speech Research
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.240171
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modulation Interference from Speech-Modulated Noise in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users

Hyo Jung Choi, Jae Ho Han, Jae Hee Lee
Audiology and Speech Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Modulation Interference from Speech-Modulated Noise in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users

Hyo Jung Choi, Jae Ho Han, Jae Hee Lee
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined modulation interference in sentence recognition for bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users.Methods: Thirteen bimodal users and thirteen normal-hearing (NH) listeners (reference) participated in this study. The adaptive Korean Matrix sentence-in-noise test measured the speech reception thresholds (SRTs) required for 50% speech-in-noise intelligibility. As background noise, we presented two background noises: stationary speech-shaped noise (SSN) and single-talker speech-modulated masker (International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology noise, ICRA). The amount of masking release due to fluctuations in the speech-modulated noise, called speech masking release (SMR), was calculated from the difference between SRTs with SSN and SRTs with ICRA noise. The SRTs were measured twice for bimodal CI users: CI-only and bimodal listening.Results: The mean SMR for NH listeners was approximately 12 dB. The mean SMR for bimodal CI users was about -5 dB, with either CI alone or bimodal listening. This means that bimodal CI users experienced modulation interference rather than masking release from the temporal fluctuations. We observed positive bimodal benefits, yet the interference from fluctuating maskers was similar between the CI-only and bimodal listening. The low-frequency aided hearing thresholds in the non-implanted ear were unrelated to the amount of SMR for bimodal users.Conclusion: NH listeners could take advantage of temporal fluctuations in the speech-modulated noise. However, bimodal CI listeners hardly glimpsed target speech in the dips of the speech-modulated masker, regardless of listening mode. Bimodal listening did not significantly reduce modulation interference compared to CI-only listening.

Audiology and Speech ResearchVol. 20(4)
University of Iowa (US), Eulji University (KR), Eulji Medical Center (KR), Hallym University of Graduate Studies (KR)
National Research Foundation, Ministry of Education, National Research Foundation of Korea
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.