Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Views, and Perceptions of the Roles and Functions of Research Ethics Committees: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey

Healthcare professionals comprehend the basics of REC duties and responsibilities. However, improvements in the consistency and efficiency of ethics evaluations are still warranted. The COVID-19 pandemic stressed the importance of adaptive REC procedures; researchers, editors, and publishers learned a vitally important lesson. More efforts are warranted to increase REC member training, simplify administrative procedures, and define standard operating procedures in times of crisis. Continuous progress in these areas will allow RECs to maintain high ethical standards while supporting productive research. Editors and publishers will greatly benefit from related advances in research ethics considerations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e9
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Views, and Perceptions of the Roles and Functions of Research Ethics Committees: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey

Marlen Yessirkepov, Dana Bekaryssova, Olena Zimba, Kairat Zhakipbekov et al.
4 citations
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Ethics in medical practice
3.40
article

Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Views, and Perceptions of the Roles and Functions of Research Ethics Committees: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey

Marlen Yessirkepov, Dana Bekaryssova, Olena Zimba, Kairat Zhakipbekov, Ainur B. Qumar, Mariusz Korkosz, Burhan Fatih Koçyiğit, Birzhan Seiil
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Healthcare professionals comprehend the basics of REC duties and responsibilities. However, improvements in the consistency and efficiency of ethics evaluations are still warranted. The COVID-19 pandemic stressed the importance of adaptive REC procedures; researchers, editors, and publishers learned a vitally important lesson. More efforts are warranted to increase REC member training, simplify administrative procedures, and define standard operating procedures in times of crisis. Continuous progress in these areas will allow RECs to maintain high ethical standards while supporting productive research. Editors and publishers will greatly benefit from related advances in research ethics considerations.

Journal of Korean Medical ScienceVol. 40(4)
Jagiellonian University (PL), University of Health Science (KH), Kazakh National Medical University (KZ), Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University (UA), South Kazakhstan Medical Academy (KZ), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation (PL), Krakow Cardiovascular Research Institute (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in medical practice
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Views, and Perceptions of the Roles and Functions of Research Ethics Committees: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey — Marlen Yessirkepov, Dana Bekaryssova, et al. · Journal of Korean Medical Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS