Selecting Injected Viscosity in Polymer Flood Projects: A Controversial and Critical Question

Abstract Polymer injection is now a mature EOR process, and numerous large-scale expansions are currently underway while new projects are being designed all over the world. Curiously, one of the basic design questions still remains highly controversial: what is the optimum viscosity that should be injected? Some practitioners advocate injecting very high viscosities while others advocate just the opposite. The selection of the viscosity to inject has obvious economic implications as it is directly linked to the polymer concentration and thus to the cost of the polymer which can reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars for large expansions. This paper will explain why the question still remains without a clear answer and will describe the arguments of both camps while outlining the pros and cons of each approach using case studies. The paper reviews the theoretical and practical arguments based on real field experience to help future project designers select the right viscosity for their polymer project. This is a critical issue as this can have an impact on injectivity and economics. The Gogarty method is a theoretical tool to select polymer viscosity, but it is extremely conservative and may lead to over-design. Reservoir simulations have also been used in several cases to justify extremely high polymer viscosities but in some cases field results do not bear out these expectations. The conclusions of this work show that several factors need to be considered when selecting polymer viscosity; beyond injectivity and mobility control which are obvious ones, another important factor is the reservoir layering. Field experience shows that in single layer reservoirs such as those in Canada, lower viscosities can be used but that in cases of heterogeneous, multi-layer reservoirs, higher viscosities are required. However, theory demonstrates that even when injecting infinite polymer viscosity, vertical sweep will remain controlled by the permeability contrasts. Finally practical concerns for expansions should not be forgotten: practical experience in Daqing for instance shows that injecting at high viscosity can cause severe casing and vibration issues, while theory and practical experience in other fields both confirm that produced polymer concentration could cause severe issues in the surface facilities. Reservoir and surface aspects need to be considered with the view that even when designing a pilot, large-scale expansion is the ultimate goal that needs to be kept in sight. Expansions require not only successful pilots but also attractive economics and will present challenges beyond those experienced in a pilot such as separation issues in the surface facilities. The paper will provide some guidance for the design of their future projects and provide the context for making such decisions in the framework of large-scale field projects.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/222035-ms
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selecting Injected Viscosity in Polymer Flood Projects: A Controversial and Critical Question

Eric Delamaide
3 citations
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
1.01
article

Selecting Injected Viscosity in Polymer Flood Projects: A Controversial and Critical Question

Eric Delamaide
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Polymer injection is now a mature EOR process, and numerous large-scale expansions are currently underway while new projects are being designed all over the world. Curiously, one of the basic design questions still remains highly controversial: what is the optimum viscosity that should be injected? Some practitioners advocate injecting very high viscosities while others advocate just the opposite. The selection of the viscosity to inject has obvious economic implications as it is directly linked to the polymer concentration and thus to the cost of the polymer which can reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars for large expansions. This paper will explain why the question still remains without a clear answer and will describe the arguments of both camps while outlining the pros and cons of each approach using case studies. The paper reviews the theoretical and practical arguments based on real field experience to help future project designers select the right viscosity for their polymer project. This is a critical issue as this can have an impact on injectivity and economics. The Gogarty method is a theoretical tool to select polymer viscosity, but it is extremely conservative and may lead to over-design. Reservoir simulations have also been used in several cases to justify extremely high polymer viscosities but in some cases field results do not bear out these expectations. The conclusions of this work show that several factors need to be considered when selecting polymer viscosity; beyond injectivity and mobility control which are obvious ones, another important factor is the reservoir layering. Field experience shows that in single layer reservoirs such as those in Canada, lower viscosities can be used but that in cases of heterogeneous, multi-layer reservoirs, higher viscosities are required. However, theory demonstrates that even when injecting infinite polymer viscosity, vertical sweep will remain controlled by the permeability contrasts. Finally practical concerns for expansions should not be forgotten: practical experience in Daqing for instance shows that injecting at high viscosity can cause severe casing and vibration issues, while theory and practical experience in other fields both confirm that produced polymer concentration could cause severe issues in the surface facilities. Reservoir and surface aspects need to be considered with the view that even when designing a pilot, large-scale expansion is the ultimate goal that needs to be kept in sight. Expansions require not only successful pilots but also attractive economics and will present challenges beyond those experienced in a pilot such as separation issues in the surface facilities. The paper will provide some guidance for the design of their future projects and provide the context for making such decisions in the framework of large-scale field projects.

Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.