Is the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf Mandated to Consider Submissions from Non-States Parties to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea?

Abstract This article scrutinises the mandate of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (Commission) to consider submissions from non-States Parties to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea ( LOSC ). It challenges the prevailing viewpoints that exclude non-State Parties from the submission process, proposing a nuanced approach that privileges legal orthodoxy and political feasibility. It proposes that LOSC Article 76, containing the Commission’s mandate, can be interpreted as a stipulation pour atrui , conferring rights to third States in accordance with Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Innovatively, this possibility is explored here with a particular concern for preserving the balance of interests achieved in 1982. Its timeliness is due to the intentions of making a submission recently expressed by the United States, a non-State Party.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-bja10212
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf Mandated to Consider Submissions from Non-States Parties to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea?

Eduardo Cavalcanti
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
International Maritime Law Issues
article

Is the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf Mandated to Consider Submissions from Non-States Parties to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea?

Eduardo Cavalcanti
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article scrutinises the mandate of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (Commission) to consider submissions from non-States Parties to the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea ( LOSC ). It challenges the prevailing viewpoints that exclude non-State Parties from the submission process, proposing a nuanced approach that privileges legal orthodoxy and political feasibility. It proposes that LOSC Article 76, containing the Commission’s mandate, can be interpreted as a stipulation pour atrui , conferring rights to third States in accordance with Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Innovatively, this possibility is explored here with a particular concern for preserving the balance of interests achieved in 1982. Its timeliness is due to the intentions of making a submission recently expressed by the United States, a non-State Party.

The International Journal of Marine and Coastal LawVol. 40(3)
National University of Singapore (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
International Maritime Law Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.