On the Necessity of System Criminalistic Support for Prosecution

Introduction: the paper examines some criminalistic aspects of prosecution, identifies certain trends, substantiates the fundamental part of the prosecutor’s office activities in criminal proceedings, and formulates proposals for improving law enforcement in general. Purpose: the substantiation of the statement on the necessity of using forensic recommendations in criminal proceedings in general, as well as the advisability of system criminalistic support for prosecution in particular. Methods: the methodological framework for the study consists of methods of scientific cognition, among which the main ones are the methods of analysis, consistency, synthesis, and comparative law. Results: the conclusion is formulated that the prosecutor’s office should delegate the coordination of the implementation of forensic recommendations at all stages of the criminal process and also assign the duty of enormous control over their implementation on an ongoing basis. Conclusions: based on the provisions outlined in the work, the author concludes about the absolute validity of the introduction and use of criminalistic categories in prosecution, regardless of the stages of the criminal process. It is concluded that the application of forensic recommendations will help eliminate certain difficulties in handling the prosecution, which will lead to a reduction in the number of violations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Legal Concept
Published
2024-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2024.2.23
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Necessity of System Criminalistic Support for Prosecution

Georgy Safronsky
Legal Concept
Digital Transformation in Law
article

On the Necessity of System Criminalistic Support for Prosecution

Georgy Safronsky
article en

Abstract

Introduction: the paper examines some criminalistic aspects of prosecution, identifies certain trends, substantiates the fundamental part of the prosecutor’s office activities in criminal proceedings, and formulates proposals for improving law enforcement in general. Purpose: the substantiation of the statement on the necessity of using forensic recommendations in criminal proceedings in general, as well as the advisability of system criminalistic support for prosecution in particular. Methods: the methodological framework for the study consists of methods of scientific cognition, among which the main ones are the methods of analysis, consistency, synthesis, and comparative law. Results: the conclusion is formulated that the prosecutor’s office should delegate the coordination of the implementation of forensic recommendations at all stages of the criminal process and also assign the duty of enormous control over their implementation on an ongoing basis. Conclusions: based on the provisions outlined in the work, the author concludes about the absolute validity of the introduction and use of criminalistic categories in prosecution, regardless of the stages of the criminal process. It is concluded that the application of forensic recommendations will help eliminate certain difficulties in handling the prosecution, which will lead to a reduction in the number of violations.

Legal ConceptVol. 23(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.