Beamtimes and knowledge production times: how big-science research infrastructures shape nations’ domestic and international science production
Frontier scientific discoveries increasingly rely on big-science research infrastructures, such as supercolliders, synchrotron light sources, and space telescopes, whose construction and operation involve intensive international collaboration. This collaborative nature, however, presents a challenge in balancing national interests with the common good, particularly given the substantial fiscal investments involved. This study investigates the effects of one of China’s prominent big-science infrastructures, the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF), on the country’s production of science, differentiating between national and international scientific endeavors. Employing a rigorous difference-in-differences (DID) methodology, it evaluates SSRF’s effects on discipline-level production of publications by domestic researchers and those involving international collaboration. The empirical findings reveal compelling evidence that SSRF has significantly enhanced the production of high-impact national and international publications for disciplines reliant on the facility for experiments, particularly increasing the percentage of high-impact national publications. The findings also underscore the dual role of big-science infrastructures in fostering international research collaboration while simultaneously enhancing nations’ domestic scientific development and competitiveness. Additionally, the study provides valuable insights for research assessment and science policy discussions.
Authors
- Cong Cao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3407-7837)
- Xiaoyu Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3707-1980)
- Xiyi Yang
Institutions
- University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
- ShanghaiTech University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
- Published
- 2024-11-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03993-4
- Primary Topic
- International Science and Diplomacy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China