From 10% to 20%: Influence of Annual Sunlight Exposure Threshold on the Acceptability of Daylighting Performance under Different Sky Conditions

The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) v4 daylight credit criteria were adjusted, and the Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE) threshold was increased from 10% to 20%. The ASE < 20% threshold was also implemented by the Illuminating Engineering Society in the recent lighting measurements standard in 2023. However, the implications of this change across diverse sky conditions remain unclear. Simulations for a typical office space across 32 cities (15°N to 65°N) considered various sky conditions, encompassing 360° orientations and 5%–100% window-to-wall ratios (WWRs). Implementing the ASE < 20% threshold increased accepted daylighting cases from 21% to 52%. Spaces with WWRs between 85% and 100% and oriented between 140°S and 230°S now consistently achieve acceptable daylighting performance in all tested cities, compared to those oriented between 150°S and 210°S, when ASE is ≤10%. The new threshold resulted in greater sensitivity to the sky conditions, aligning more closely with the city’s latitude. Applying both the old and new thresholds shows that spaces with WWRs less than 20% do not achieve acceptable daylighting, regardless of orientation or location. The ASE < 20% appears to favor cities at lower latitudes, with a 168%–260% increase in accepted cases for cities closer to the equator (latitude 15°N to 35°N), compared to a 125%–150% increase for cities further north (latitude 45°N to 65°N). This is related to the spatial Daylight Autonomy limitations imposed by the sky conditions of the northern locations. This disparity suggests that the LEED daylight credit criteria may be more difficult to achieve in higher latitude locations. It is suggested that the LEED credit criteria could be reconsidered in the future for those locations so that they become more sensitive to the differentiated sky conditions in various latitudes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeied.aeeng-1845
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From 10% to 20%: Influence of Annual Sunlight Exposure Threshold on the Acceptability of Daylighting Performance under Different Sky Conditions

Ahmed Sherif, Islam Mashaly, Mariam El-Hussainy
1 citations
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
0.27
article

From 10% to 20%: Influence of Annual Sunlight Exposure Threshold on the Acceptability of Daylighting Performance under Different Sky Conditions

Ahmed Sherif, Islam Mashaly, Mariam El-Hussainy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) v4 daylight credit criteria were adjusted, and the Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE) threshold was increased from 10% to 20%. The ASE < 20% threshold was also implemented by the Illuminating Engineering Society in the recent lighting measurements standard in 2023. However, the implications of this change across diverse sky conditions remain unclear. Simulations for a typical office space across 32 cities (15°N to 65°N) considered various sky conditions, encompassing 360° orientations and 5%–100% window-to-wall ratios (WWRs). Implementing the ASE < 20% threshold increased accepted daylighting cases from 21% to 52%. Spaces with WWRs between 85% and 100% and oriented between 140°S and 230°S now consistently achieve acceptable daylighting performance in all tested cities, compared to those oriented between 150°S and 210°S, when ASE is ≤10%. The new threshold resulted in greater sensitivity to the sky conditions, aligning more closely with the city’s latitude. Applying both the old and new thresholds shows that spaces with WWRs less than 20% do not achieve acceptable daylighting, regardless of orientation or location. The ASE < 20% appears to favor cities at lower latitudes, with a 168%–260% increase in accepted cases for cities closer to the equator (latitude 15°N to 35°N), compared to a 125%–150% increase for cities further north (latitude 45°N to 65°N). This is related to the spatial Daylight Autonomy limitations imposed by the sky conditions of the northern locations. This disparity suggests that the LEED daylight credit criteria may be more difficult to achieve in higher latitude locations. It is suggested that the LEED credit criteria could be reconsidered in the future for those locations so that they become more sensitive to the differentiated sky conditions in various latitudes.

Journal of Architectural EngineeringVol. 31(1)
American University in Cairo (EG)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
0.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.