A refined output-only modal identification technique for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructures

The increasing installation of structural health monitoring systems has raised the need for efficient and rapid data interpretation algorithms. Operational modal analysis is currently one of the most used techniques for extracting modal properties, and some attempts have been made to automate this procedure. However, automated techniques often require manual calibration of hyperparameters and show inconsistencies across different case studies. This paper proposes a refined version of the automated frequency domain decomposition (AFDD) using the modal assurance criterion (MAC) to obtain natural frequencies and mode shapes. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on the ambient vibration response of the Yonghe cable-stayed bridge in China, accounting for influential factors including noise levels, acceleration record length, sensor layouts. A novel approach is then introduced to interpret the results of the sensitivity analyses. The approach consists in plotting the result of each analysis in a stabilization diagram and then using a Gaussian mixture model that clusters the poles into core and outliers. This allows to identify regions where the MAC thresholds are optimal. By comparing the results of all the sensitivity analyses it was possible to define a single optimal MAC threshold, avoiding the need for fixing a value based on the user’s experience. Three substantially different case studies were analyzed to extensively test the methodology: the Yonghe cable-stayed bridge, the PolyU footbridge in Hong Kong, and Moletta Tower in the Circus Maximus archeological site in Italy. The analysis compared the proposed AFDD algorithm to the traditional frequency domain decomposition and covariance-driven stochastic subspace identification. Specifically, the efficiency in identifying close frequencies, weakly excited modes, spurious peaks, and complex modes was evaluated for each method, which highlighted the robustness of the proposed optimized AFDD. The analysis showcases peculiar characteristics and drawbacks of each method when trying to identify complex vibrational modes of the specific case studies. It was found that the proposed AFDD procedure performs better than traditional methods despite it may misidentify complex modes due to the constraints of a narrower modal domain and similar geometries. • An automated output-only modal identification algorithm is presented. • Sensitivity analyses and Gaussian mixture model to establish optimal parameters. • Validation on cable-stayed bridge, footbridge, medieval tower using real SHM data. • In-depth comparison among AFDD, traditional FDD and covariance-driven SSI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Structures
Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119210
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A refined output-only modal identification technique for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructures

Gian Paolo Cimellaro, Amir Reza Elahi, Alessandro Cardoni
7 citations
Engineering Structures
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
1.83
article

A refined output-only modal identification technique for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructures

Gian Paolo Cimellaro, Amir Reza Elahi, Alessandro Cardoni
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The increasing installation of structural health monitoring systems has raised the need for efficient and rapid data interpretation algorithms. Operational modal analysis is currently one of the most used techniques for extracting modal properties, and some attempts have been made to automate this procedure. However, automated techniques often require manual calibration of hyperparameters and show inconsistencies across different case studies. This paper proposes a refined version of the automated frequency domain decomposition (AFDD) using the modal assurance criterion (MAC) to obtain natural frequencies and mode shapes. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on the ambient vibration response of the Yonghe cable-stayed bridge in China, accounting for influential factors including noise levels, acceleration record length, sensor layouts. A novel approach is then introduced to interpret the results of the sensitivity analyses. The approach consists in plotting the result of each analysis in a stabilization diagram and then using a Gaussian mixture model that clusters the poles into core and outliers. This allows to identify regions where the MAC thresholds are optimal. By comparing the results of all the sensitivity analyses it was possible to define a single optimal MAC threshold, avoiding the need for fixing a value based on the user’s experience. Three substantially different case studies were analyzed to extensively test the methodology: the Yonghe cable-stayed bridge, the PolyU footbridge in Hong Kong, and Moletta Tower in the Circus Maximus archeological site in Italy. The analysis compared the proposed AFDD algorithm to the traditional frequency domain decomposition and covariance-driven stochastic subspace identification. Specifically, the efficiency in identifying close frequencies, weakly excited modes, spurious peaks, and complex modes was evaluated for each method, which highlighted the robustness of the proposed optimized AFDD. The analysis showcases peculiar characteristics and drawbacks of each method when trying to identify complex vibrational modes of the specific case studies. It was found that the proposed AFDD procedure performs better than traditional methods despite it may misidentify complex modes due to the constraints of a narrower modal domain and similar geometries. • An automated output-only modal identification algorithm is presented. • Sensitivity analyses and Gaussian mixture model to establish optimal parameters. • Validation on cable-stayed bridge, footbridge, medieval tower using real SHM data. • In-depth comparison among AFDD, traditional FDD and covariance-driven SSI.

Engineering StructuresVol. 323
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
1.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.