Robustness analysis of dynamic progressive collapse of precast concrete beam–column assemblies using dry connections under uniformly distributed load

A series of dynamic progressive collapse tests using the uniformly distributed load (UDL) was conducted, to analyze the robustness of three precast concrete (PC) beam–column assemblies using dry connections of top-and-seat angles (TSA-D), strengthened top-and-seat angles (STSA-D), and high-ductility reinforcement (DSTSA-D), under a middle column removal scenario. Finite element (FE) models were also developed to accurately simulate the collapse process. Based on the tests and FE models, comparative studies were conducted on dynamic and static collapse responses of the PC assemblies with identical configuration, loading regime, and boundary conditions. The results showed that: the horizontal reaction force developments were similar under dynamic and static collapse scenarios; under dynamic collapse scenarios, the initial stiffness of the PC assemblies increased due to the strain rate effect, while the peak vertical reaction forces under the compressive arch action (CAA) were smaller than those under static collapse scenarios, attributed to dynamic damage; under both dynamic and static collapse scenarios under UDL, the beam deformed in a downward convex curved shape, with local material deformation becoming more concentrated under dynamic collapse scenarios. An energy-based method for calculating dynamic collapse resistance was evaluated and revised: 1) the traditional method, which converts static responses from static analysis into dynamic responses was found to underestimate the resistance under small deformations due to neglecting the strain rate effect, and to overestimate ultimate resistance by ignoring dynamic damage; 2) by using dynamic vertical reaction forces instead, a more accurate prediction of the dynamic collapse resistance was achieved with a single dynamic collapse analysis. Additionally, dynamic amplification factors for the PC assemblies were calculated based on FE models and static test results providing basic knowledge in whole PC structural level research. • Dynamic progressive collapse tests under uniformly distributed load. • High-fidelity finite element models simulating dynamic collapse of PC assemblies. • Comparison between dynamic and static collapse responses of PC assemblies. • Dynamic collapse resistance considering strain rate effect and dynamic damage. • Dynamic amplification factors (DAF) for simplified collapse resisting design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Structures
Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119206
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robustness analysis of dynamic progressive collapse of precast concrete beam–column assemblies using dry connections under uniformly distributed load

Weijing Zhang, Mengzhu Diao, Yi Li, Yilin Liu et al.
7 citations
Engineering Structures
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
1.83
article

Robustness analysis of dynamic progressive collapse of precast concrete beam–column assemblies using dry connections under uniformly distributed load

Weijing Zhang, Mengzhu Diao, Yi Li, Yilin Liu, Zidong Zhao, Xiaowei Cheng
article en
7 citations

Abstract

A series of dynamic progressive collapse tests using the uniformly distributed load (UDL) was conducted, to analyze the robustness of three precast concrete (PC) beam–column assemblies using dry connections of top-and-seat angles (TSA-D), strengthened top-and-seat angles (STSA-D), and high-ductility reinforcement (DSTSA-D), under a middle column removal scenario. Finite element (FE) models were also developed to accurately simulate the collapse process. Based on the tests and FE models, comparative studies were conducted on dynamic and static collapse responses of the PC assemblies with identical configuration, loading regime, and boundary conditions. The results showed that: the horizontal reaction force developments were similar under dynamic and static collapse scenarios; under dynamic collapse scenarios, the initial stiffness of the PC assemblies increased due to the strain rate effect, while the peak vertical reaction forces under the compressive arch action (CAA) were smaller than those under static collapse scenarios, attributed to dynamic damage; under both dynamic and static collapse scenarios under UDL, the beam deformed in a downward convex curved shape, with local material deformation becoming more concentrated under dynamic collapse scenarios. An energy-based method for calculating dynamic collapse resistance was evaluated and revised: 1) the traditional method, which converts static responses from static analysis into dynamic responses was found to underestimate the resistance under small deformations due to neglecting the strain rate effect, and to overestimate ultimate resistance by ignoring dynamic damage; 2) by using dynamic vertical reaction forces instead, a more accurate prediction of the dynamic collapse resistance was achieved with a single dynamic collapse analysis. Additionally, dynamic amplification factors for the PC assemblies were calculated based on FE models and static test results providing basic knowledge in whole PC structural level research. • Dynamic progressive collapse tests under uniformly distributed load. • High-fidelity finite element models simulating dynamic collapse of PC assemblies. • Comparison between dynamic and static collapse responses of PC assemblies. • Dynamic collapse resistance considering strain rate effect and dynamic damage. • Dynamic amplification factors (DAF) for simplified collapse resisting design.

Engineering StructuresVol. 323
University of Wollongong (AU), Beijing University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
1.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.