Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Adolescents Completing An Evidence-based Return To Sport Program.

Strength and functional deficits are common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and persist 6-months following. However, participating in evidence-based, tailored return to sport (RTS) training from 6- to 9-months post-ACLR may aid in meeting strength and function goals for safer RTS. PURPOSE: Compare 6- and 9-month quadriceps (Q) and hamstrings (H) strength, countermovement jump (CMJ), single-leg vertical jump (SLJ), and subjective function (International Knee Documentation Committee; IKDC) in adolescents post-ACLR versus matched controls. METHODS: This was a longitudinal, prospective case-control study on 14 adolescents post-ACLR, and 14 healthy age- and sex-matched controls (16 M, 12F; 15 ± 2 y; 21.7 ± 2.9 kg/m2). Participants completed isometric Q and H strength, CMJ, and SLJ assessments using automated dynamometry, force plate, and video systems. The ACLR group had clinical and IKDC measures at 6- and 9-months post-ACLR, and completed tailored 10-week RTS training (Table). We used repeated measures analyses of variance to assess visit and limb effects for strength, CMJ and SLJ force measures within the ACLR group, and group by visit for involved and matched limbs. Paired t-tests were used for IKDC. RESULTS: The ACLR group’s uninvolved limb was stronger than their surgical limb (mean difference [MD]: 0.53 ± 0.20 Nm/kg, p = .01). The ACLR group had increased CMJ peak power (MD: 0.94 ± 0.46 W/kg, p = .05), and SLJ concentric force (25 ± 11 N, p = .03) and peak power (96.9 ± 11.9 W, p < .01) at 9- versus 6-months. There were no significant differences between groups for involved and matched limb outcomes. IKDC scores improved at 9-months (7.5 ± 3.2, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The ACL-R group improved function and jump performance following RTS training. The ACL-R group had comparable measures to controls across visits. Clinicians may consider incorporating tailored training to improve sport-specific demands for ACLR patients.Supported by: Funded by VALD Performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001093664.91679.dc
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Adolescents Completing An Evidence-based Return To Sport Program.

Dennis E. Kramer, Danielle L. Hunt, Alexandra F. DeJong Lempke, Landon B. Lempke et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Adolescents Completing An Evidence-based Return To Sport Program.

Dennis E. Kramer, Danielle L. Hunt, Alexandra F. DeJong Lempke, Landon B. Lempke, Scott J. Cameron, Melissa A. Christino, Stephan G. Bodkin, Matthew D. Milewski, Mininder S. Kocher, Shannon Nagle, William P. Meehan
article en

Abstract

Strength and functional deficits are common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and persist 6-months following. However, participating in evidence-based, tailored return to sport (RTS) training from 6- to 9-months post-ACLR may aid in meeting strength and function goals for safer RTS. PURPOSE: Compare 6- and 9-month quadriceps (Q) and hamstrings (H) strength, countermovement jump (CMJ), single-leg vertical jump (SLJ), and subjective function (International Knee Documentation Committee; IKDC) in adolescents post-ACLR versus matched controls. METHODS: This was a longitudinal, prospective case-control study on 14 adolescents post-ACLR, and 14 healthy age- and sex-matched controls (16 M, 12F; 15 ± 2 y; 21.7 ± 2.9 kg/m2). Participants completed isometric Q and H strength, CMJ, and SLJ assessments using automated dynamometry, force plate, and video systems. The ACLR group had clinical and IKDC measures at 6- and 9-months post-ACLR, and completed tailored 10-week RTS training (Table). We used repeated measures analyses of variance to assess visit and limb effects for strength, CMJ and SLJ force measures within the ACLR group, and group by visit for involved and matched limbs. Paired t-tests were used for IKDC. RESULTS: The ACLR group’s uninvolved limb was stronger than their surgical limb (mean difference [MD]: 0.53 ± 0.20 Nm/kg, p = .01). The ACLR group had increased CMJ peak power (MD: 0.94 ± 0.46 W/kg, p = .05), and SLJ concentric force (25 ± 11 N, p = .03) and peak power (96.9 ± 11.9 W, p < .01) at 9- versus 6-months. There were no significant differences between groups for involved and matched limb outcomes. IKDC scores improved at 9-months (7.5 ± 3.2, p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: The ACL-R group improved function and jump performance following RTS training. The ACL-R group had comparable measures to controls across visits. Clinicians may consider incorporating tailored training to improve sport-specific demands for ACLR patients.Supported by: Funded by VALD Performance.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Boston Children's Hospital (US), University of Utah (US), University of Michigan (US), Boston Children's Museum (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.