Conceptualizing Parliamentary Diplomacy

Aim . The article reveals the conceptual foundations of parliamentary diplomacy. Methods. In order to fulfill the purpose, the author drew upon theoretical methodology namely modelling, chronological, comparative, complementary and parallel approaches. Results . The phases of development of parliamentary diplomacy are outlined. The theoretical model (institutional design) of parliamentary diplomacy is designed. The features of the international activities of representative authorities are outlined. Conclusions . First, the geopolitical processes of the second half of the 20th century have caused parliamentary diplomacy to transform into double legitimate diplomacy, a new form of soft power tool and independent holistic concept. Second, parliamentary diplomacy has acquired a complex body (model), including various dimensions, levels of institutionalization, tools, forms and formats of cooperation. Third, although parliamentary diplomacy has a number of advantages over cabinet diplomacy (greater flexibility, informality and less bias), the other side of its institutional features (reduced powers, limited resources and ideological colouring) may have a negative impact on applied outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EURASIAN INTEGRATION economics law politics
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-2929-2024-03-112-121
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptualizing Parliamentary Diplomacy

L. А. Savelchev
2 citations
EURASIAN INTEGRATION economics law politics
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
1.11
article

Conceptualizing Parliamentary Diplomacy

L. А. Savelchev
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Aim . The article reveals the conceptual foundations of parliamentary diplomacy. Methods. In order to fulfill the purpose, the author drew upon theoretical methodology namely modelling, chronological, comparative, complementary and parallel approaches. Results . The phases of development of parliamentary diplomacy are outlined. The theoretical model (institutional design) of parliamentary diplomacy is designed. The features of the international activities of representative authorities are outlined. Conclusions . First, the geopolitical processes of the second half of the 20th century have caused parliamentary diplomacy to transform into double legitimate diplomacy, a new form of soft power tool and independent holistic concept. Second, parliamentary diplomacy has acquired a complex body (model), including various dimensions, levels of institutionalization, tools, forms and formats of cooperation. Third, although parliamentary diplomacy has a number of advantages over cabinet diplomacy (greater flexibility, informality and less bias), the other side of its institutional features (reduced powers, limited resources and ideological colouring) may have a negative impact on applied outcomes.

EURASIAN INTEGRATION economics law politicsVol. 18(3)
Baltic State Technical University Voenmeh (RU)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.