Analysis of Student Output on the Use of ChatGPT: A Predictive Model Approach

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed various aspects of education, with AI-powered language models like ChatGPT gaining popularity due to their unique features and advantages. This study aims to analyze student outputs and develop a predictive model to assess whether essay-type answers, Dropbox submissions, and machine problems were generated using ChatGPT, employing machine learning algorithms such as Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Student outputs are evaluated using six AI detection tools: Contentatscale, Crossplag, GPTZero, KazanSEO, Sapling, and ZeroGPT. The results are predicted by NB, RF, and KNN, which were chosen for their strong performance in text classification, robustness, and ability to manage non-linear data. The analysis examines performance metrics, including Recall, Precision-Recall Curve (PRC) Area, and Class Accuracy, to provide insights into the predictive capabilities of these models. The findings reveal that NB outperformed the other algorithms, achieving the highest correctly classified instances at 23.19% and a Kappa statistic of 0.1072, indicating slight agreement in classification accuracy, while RF and KNN recorded 14.49% and 15.94%, respectively. Additionally, NB demonstrated the highest true positive rate of 0.232 and PRC area of 0.466, while KNN achieved the best PRC area at 0.566, reflecting varied performance across models. Generally, while Naive Bayes showed superior accuracy and predictive ability, each model has unique strengths that can be leveraged to analyze student outputs and evaluate the use of tools like ChatGPT in educational settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/ijett-v72i10p121
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Student Output on the Use of ChatGPT: A Predictive Model Approach

Jovelin M. Lapates, Derren N. Gaylo, Mark Daniel G. Dacer
1 citations
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
article

Analysis of Student Output on the Use of ChatGPT: A Predictive Model Approach

Jovelin M. Lapates, Derren N. Gaylo, Mark Daniel G. Dacer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed various aspects of education, with AI-powered language models like ChatGPT gaining popularity due to their unique features and advantages. This study aims to analyze student outputs and develop a predictive model to assess whether essay-type answers, Dropbox submissions, and machine problems were generated using ChatGPT, employing machine learning algorithms such as Naive Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). Student outputs are evaluated using six AI detection tools: Contentatscale, Crossplag, GPTZero, KazanSEO, Sapling, and ZeroGPT. The results are predicted by NB, RF, and KNN, which were chosen for their strong performance in text classification, robustness, and ability to manage non-linear data. The analysis examines performance metrics, including Recall, Precision-Recall Curve (PRC) Area, and Class Accuracy, to provide insights into the predictive capabilities of these models. The findings reveal that NB outperformed the other algorithms, achieving the highest correctly classified instances at 23.19% and a Kappa statistic of 0.1072, indicating slight agreement in classification accuracy, while RF and KNN recorded 14.49% and 15.94%, respectively. Additionally, NB demonstrated the highest true positive rate of 0.232 and PRC area of 0.466, while KNN achieved the best PRC area at 0.566, reflecting varied performance across models. Generally, while Naive Bayes showed superior accuracy and predictive ability, each model has unique strengths that can be leveraged to analyze student outputs and evaluate the use of tools like ChatGPT in educational settings.

International Journal of Engineering Trends and TechnologyVol. 72(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.