The Prediction of Form Four Science Achievement with Online Learning and Student’s Self-Efficacy

Student’s self-efficacy and online learning is believed to reflect the confidence to master the learning of science. Proportional stratified random sampling technique was applied to 300 respondents. Quantitative survey was conducted through data collection using a set of 57-item research questions and a 30-item Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) science test. The data was analysed using a statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 26.0. The value of alpha Cronbach reliability in online learning research questions a=0.890, self-efficacy a=0.917, and science achievement test a=0.774. Stepwise multiple regression test results indicated that online learning and student’s self-efficacy contributed 14 percent of the student science achievement, [F (2,297) = 24.246, p<.05]. The regression coefficient showed that both the variables of online learning (β=0.343), and self-efficacy (β=0.315), made a positive contribution to the science achievement of Form Four students. These findings explain that students who are at a high level of online learning and have a high level of self-efficacy also have a higher level of science achievement. It is found in this study that the main predictors of student science achievement are online learning followed by self-efficacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH)
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v9i10.3005
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prediction of Form Four Science Achievement with Online Learning and Student’s Self-Efficacy

Crispina Gregory K Han, Valentine Yasun
Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH)
Education and Learning Interventions
article

The Prediction of Form Four Science Achievement with Online Learning and Student’s Self-Efficacy

Crispina Gregory K Han, Valentine Yasun
article en

Abstract

Student’s self-efficacy and online learning is believed to reflect the confidence to master the learning of science. Proportional stratified random sampling technique was applied to 300 respondents. Quantitative survey was conducted through data collection using a set of 57-item research questions and a 30-item Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) science test. The data was analysed using a statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 26.0. The value of alpha Cronbach reliability in online learning research questions a=0.890, self-efficacy a=0.917, and science achievement test a=0.774. Stepwise multiple regression test results indicated that online learning and student’s self-efficacy contributed 14 percent of the student science achievement, [F (2,297) = 24.246, p<.05]. The regression coefficient showed that both the variables of online learning (β=0.343), and self-efficacy (β=0.315), made a positive contribution to the science achievement of Form Four students. These findings explain that students who are at a high level of online learning and have a high level of self-efficacy also have a higher level of science achievement. It is found in this study that the main predictors of student science achievement are online learning followed by self-efficacy.

Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH)Vol. 9(10)
Universiti of Malaysia Sabah (MY), Petronas (Malaysia) (MY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.