Optimizing pyrolysis and Co-Pyrolysis of plastic and biomass using Artificial Intelligence

• Bio-oil yield and composition can be predicted with a high accuracy at R 2 > 0.97. • The highest contributors are plastic content (18%) and biomass type (13%) • The most optimal yield is identified via multi-objective optimization. • Uncertainty analysis reveals that bio-oil yield falls within a range of 30–50% • A case study demonstrates optimal features at 500 °C and 60 min heating rate. The rapid increase in biomass and plastic waste poses significant environmental challenges. Co-pyrolysis of biomass with plastic wastes offers a promising avenue for sustainable waste management and renewable energy generation. This study covers several novel aspects: First, it investigates the impacts of feedstock composition and operating conditions in pyrolysis (individual feedstock) and co-pyrolysis (biomass and plastic wastes). The study reveals that synergistic effects, specifically improved yields and optimized temperature, exist in the co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic wastes compared to individual feedstock. Secondly, a suitable blended machine learning predictive model (with Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Regressor, and XGBoost) and robust optimization framework are developed to address model accuracy, non-linear interactions, and uncertainties in pyrolysis such as temperature, heating rate, and biomass-to-plastic ratio. This study predicts the bio-oil yield quantitatively (amount) and qualitatively (composition) with high accuracy (R 2 > 0.97). Thirdly, key factors contributing to yield include plastic content (18 %) and biomass type (13 %) have been identified through Gini feature importance and Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) analysis. Furthermore, multi-objective optimization techniques reveal the most optimal bio-oil yield under specific conditions, supported by uncertainty analysis, which confines bio-oil yield to a range of 30–50 %. Finally, it also demonstrates a case study to find the optimal bio-oil yield and quality conditions using co-pyrolysis of local resources, i.e., biomass (wood and bagasse) and plastic wastes. The case study suggests optimal conditions like > 50 °C heating rate, <50 min pyrolysis time, and > 60 % plastic content in a blend of wood and HDPE. This study assists industries and policymakers to assess and understand the viability of co-pyrolysis, optimal design parameters, and process impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management X
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100783
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing pyrolysis and Co-Pyrolysis of plastic and biomass using Artificial Intelligence

Dilip Khatiwada, Manish Sharma Timilsina, Yuvraj Chaudhary, Bibek Uprety et al.
16 citations
Energy Conversion and Management X
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
2.95
article

Optimizing pyrolysis and Co-Pyrolysis of plastic and biomass using Artificial Intelligence

Dilip Khatiwada, Manish Sharma Timilsina, Yuvraj Chaudhary, Bibek Uprety, Prikshya Bhattarai
article en
16 citations

Abstract

• Bio-oil yield and composition can be predicted with a high accuracy at R 2 > 0.97. • The highest contributors are plastic content (18%) and biomass type (13%) • The most optimal yield is identified via multi-objective optimization. • Uncertainty analysis reveals that bio-oil yield falls within a range of 30–50% • A case study demonstrates optimal features at 500 °C and 60 min heating rate. The rapid increase in biomass and plastic waste poses significant environmental challenges. Co-pyrolysis of biomass with plastic wastes offers a promising avenue for sustainable waste management and renewable energy generation. This study covers several novel aspects: First, it investigates the impacts of feedstock composition and operating conditions in pyrolysis (individual feedstock) and co-pyrolysis (biomass and plastic wastes). The study reveals that synergistic effects, specifically improved yields and optimized temperature, exist in the co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic wastes compared to individual feedstock. Secondly, a suitable blended machine learning predictive model (with Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Regressor, and XGBoost) and robust optimization framework are developed to address model accuracy, non-linear interactions, and uncertainties in pyrolysis such as temperature, heating rate, and biomass-to-plastic ratio. This study predicts the bio-oil yield quantitatively (amount) and qualitatively (composition) with high accuracy (R 2 > 0.97). Thirdly, key factors contributing to yield include plastic content (18 %) and biomass type (13 %) have been identified through Gini feature importance and Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) analysis. Furthermore, multi-objective optimization techniques reveal the most optimal bio-oil yield under specific conditions, supported by uncertainty analysis, which confines bio-oil yield to a range of 30–50 %. Finally, it also demonstrates a case study to find the optimal bio-oil yield and quality conditions using co-pyrolysis of local resources, i.e., biomass (wood and bagasse) and plastic wastes. The case study suggests optimal conditions like > 50 °C heating rate, <50 min pyrolysis time, and > 60 % plastic content in a blend of wood and HDPE. This study assists industries and policymakers to assess and understand the viability of co-pyrolysis, optimal design parameters, and process impacts.

Energy Conversion and Management XVol. 24
Kookmin University (KR), Tribhuvan University (NP), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Institute of Engineering (NP), Kathmandu University (NP), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Skogs- och Jordbrukets Forskningsråd, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
2.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.